Asset managers inconsistent on labour rights: 2023 proxy voting results

Asset owners collaborating to influence labour rights in investee companies have another string to their bow with the release of the Committee on Workers’ Capital report examining large fund manager voting performance.

The report, designed in part to help investors hold fund managers to account, looked at 13 resolutions in the 2023 proxy voting season examining the number of supported resolutions, as well as the consistency and transparency of behaviour in manager proxy voting. For example only three of the asset managers examined, Blackrock, LGIM and UBS Asset Management, actually disclosed their proxy voting rationale.

One clear result was the disparity in the behaviours of the US versus non-US fund managers, with the report acknowledging the drivers of that behaviour including the regulatory differences.

The largest five asset managers, all headquartered in the US – Blackrock, Vanguard, Fidelity, SSgA, JP Morgan – demonstrated low support for proxy votes related to fundamental labour rights in 2023. But the non-US cohort that was examined – Amundi, LGIM, UBS, DWS Group, SUMI Trust – voted in support of the proxy votes most of the time.

Hugues Letourneau, associate director of the CWC said the large shareholdings these firms have in the S&P500 meant it was essential for asset owners to engage their managers on labour rights. And he said the influence of managers is increasing, demonstrated by the AUM of the largest fund managers growing by 150 per cent in the 10 years since 2013, compared with pension assets in OECD markets which has grown by 46 per cent in that time.

Sponsored Content

“We do think when a large shareholder votes against a resolution it makes it easier for a company to turn around and say ‘our top 10 shareholders don’t care about this’,” he said. “It makes it easier to sweep it away. We want asset owners to share this report with managers and ask them what they are doing on the key issues we raise in the report.”

One of the resolutions examined was the freedom of association resolution at Amazon.com, co-filed by Canadian pension fund BCI, marking the first time a Canadian pension fund has filed a labour rights resolution according to Letourneau. About 20 per cent of Amazon is owned by Vanguard, BlackRock, SSgA, Fidelity Investments, and JP Morgan Asset Management.

In this case two asset managers, Blackrock and JP Morgan AM, demonstrated uneven and confusing shareholder engagement escalation pathways. They disclosed that they had been engaging with Amazon on social issues since January 2022 and yet they didn’t vote on that resolution.

The Amazon case also demonstrated an example of split voting with JP Morgan AM voting differently depending on its funds. In the case of both Amazon.com and Netflix shareholder resolutions the JP Morgan Large Cap Growth Fund voted against both resolutions, and the JP Morgan Sustainable Leaders Fund voted for both resolutions. Letourneau said this demonstrates the important role of ESG teams within fund managers to coordinate messaging and voting positions.

Letourneau is also the founder of the CWC Asset Manager Accountability Initiative, convening asset owners from around the world to engage with global asset managers on investment stewardship practices.

In the past two years it has brought groups of 15 asset owners from around the world to directly engage together with fund managers, including Macquarie, UBS, SSgA and Blackrock, in structured clients meetings. It has a scheduled meeting to discuss labour rights with Blackrock this February.

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Financial service providers commit to financing net zero

A range of global investment service providers, from stock exchanges to index providers, have signed up to the new Net Zero Financial Services Providers Alliance committing to align their products and services to net zero.

Sustainability and the need for practicality over ideology

Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University warned that the sustainability debate needs to become less ideological and more practical. He added that policy on a carbon price would do more to counter climate change than Biden’s huge infrastructure spend.

Unprecedented opportunity ahead

The climate challenge requires new investment on a staggering scale: new generating capacity, the electrification of everything, emissions-free fuel, carbon capture and sequestration, new supply chains and infrastructure, plus the building of negative emissions technologies. Stanford’s Dr Arun Majumdar explores the opportunities for new investment, the risk return trade-off and how investors should approach the opportunities.

Implementing net zero

What does it really mean to achieve a net zero strategy? As more investors make pledges for net zero, they need to set a strategy to achieve it. Investors leading the pack - ABP, Church Commissioners for England and CalSTRS - discuss the behaviour changes that are needed and how to allocate.

Poor disclosure is now a systemic risk

Poor corporate sustainability disclosure and the absence of global standards is now a systemic risk for investors, said panellists at Sustainability in Practice which included chief governance and compliance officer at Norges Bank, Carine Smith Ihencho.

ESG needs better data, better ratings and better products

Mass PRIM is involved in an MIT initiative to improve ESG with better data, ratings and ultimately products. Executive director and CIO, Michael Trotsky, explains how the ambiguity around ESG ratings creates acute challenges for investors trying to achieve both financial and social return.

Previous