NBIM calls for more listings

Norges Bank Investment Management would like to see an increase in the number of company listings and in a new research paper suggests more flexibility from exchanges and index providers could facilitate this.

The paper, The listings ecosystem – aligning incentives , examines the decline in the number of company listings and the concern this presents for investors.

It says that unintended consequences of regulations, lower capital needs, expansion of alternative funding sources, and changing market structure have been suggested as possible causes for this systematic decline.

The paper, which reflects Norges Bank Investment Management’s views, provides a framework that attempts to address this decline and proposes possible remedies that could be taken by the various stakeholders to encourage more listings.

The paper argues that at its core, the listing ecosystem needs to establish a new equilibrium to address the evolving conflicts of interest between founders, early investors, underwriters and future shareholders.

It proposes some practical steps that could be taken by brokers, exchanges and index providers.

Sponsored Content

One of the key findings is that given the demand from investors to access smaller and start-up companies, that exchanges develop new solutions in the form of new listing classes or alternative trading platforms, to enable smaller firms to go public at an earlier stage of their life cycle.

NBIM welcomes the idea of junior or secondary exchanges that aim to reduce barriers of entry for smaller firms. And that eligibility criteria, like trading liquidity and reporting frequency, could be relaxed at the early stages of new company’s listed life cycle.

It suggests that index providers could also be more relaxed and revisit their rules for inclusion.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

Does it pay to pay performance fees?

A new study finds no statistical evidence that returns of pension funds that pay performance fees for active investing are significantly higher or lower than the returns of pension funds that don't.

Infrastructure prices don’t show bubble

A decade of price increases in unlisted infrastructure raised fears of an “infrastructure bubble”. On the contrary, this period was one of price discovery for a nascent asset class, research by EDHECinfra finds.

Tough times greet new CalPERS CIO

Ben Meng isn’t easing into his role. The new CIO of CalPERS faces three new board members, a stressed private equity program and executive turnover, all under the pressure of a 70 per cent funded status and a maturing membership at the $340 billion fund.

Value lies where precious data is stored

Organisations across the globe are collecting data, analysing and re-analysing it more and more every day. As this trend continues, data infrastructure – tangible or intangible – becomes increasingly attractive. Canada’s OPTrust cites this reality as the rationale behind the EdgeCore partnership. It thinks data is its own asset class.

Northern LGPS forges own pooling path

The UK’s £45 billion Northern LGPS pool has eschewed creating a separate FCA-regulated entity, seeing it as an unnecessary expense. Moves in infrastructure and private equity have also reflected the asset pool’s laser-like focus on keeping costs down.

LUCRF’s member profile drives strategy

Leigh Gavin, CIO at Australian industry-fund pioneer LUCRF Super, takes care to match portfolios and costs with the needs of the fund’s low-balance membership. In recent years, this has meant taking on additional risk and questioning fee models in private equity.

Previous