Why investors must engage on the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance

Antibiotics are among the most transformative innovations in medical history.

In 1928, a chance event in a London laboratory led to the discovery of penicillin and changed the course of medicine. Since then, these powerful drugs have saved countless lives by combating bacterial infections that once led to severe illness or death.

Antibiotics treat many infectious diseases as well as enable complex medical procedures, such as cancer treatments and organ transplants. They also play an essential role in safeguarding public health and supporting agricultural productivity.

However, overuse of antibiotics is driving the emergence of drug-resistant microbes, making infections increasingly difficult to treat. This leads to longer hospital stays, higher medical costs, and increased mortality.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a natural process where bacteria, as living organisms, evolve over time to withstand the drugs designed to kill them. The emergence and spread of AMR is accelerated by human activity, mainly the misuse and overuse of antimicrobials to treat, prevent or control infections in humans, animals and plants.

The World Health Organization (WHO) lists AMR as one of the top global public health and development threats. It is estimated that AMR was directly responsible for 1.2 million deaths worldwide in 2019 and that is likely to rise to 1.9 million annual deaths by 2050.

Sponsored Content

The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, commissioned by the UK Government and Wellcome Trust and published in 2016, estimated that without intervention, the number of deaths associated with AMR globally will rise to 10 million by 2050 — surpassing cancer as a leading cause of mortality.

They also estimate that $100 trillion of economic output is at risk due to the rise of drug-resistant infections. In the UK alone, the annual cost of AMR to NHS is already estimated to be £180 million due to higher treatment costs for drug-resistant infections.

The main sectors that drive antibiotic consumption are healthcare, pharmaceutical industry, farming and food production. Antibiotics are widely used in agriculture, with much of their global use not aimed at treating sick animals but rather at preventing infections or promoting growth.

The quantity of antibiotics used in livestock is substantial. In the United States, for instance, over 70 per cent (by weight) of antibiotics classified as medically important for humans by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is used in animals. This significantly contributes to the development of resistant bacteria that can spread to humans through food, water, and the environment.

Lack of innovation in antibiotic development is also a contributing factor, as pharmaceutical companies face economic and regulatory challenges. The commercial returns on investment for antibiotics are lower compared to drugs for chronic conditions, which has led to a decline in research and development.

In addition, there are inadequate regulations and enforcement in many countries allowing over-the-counter sales of antibiotics, further promoting misuse.

There is a strong link between AMR and climate change, where both exacerbate each other. Intensive farming practices often lead to soil and water contamination with antibiotics, fostering the spread of resistance genes and disrupting local ecosystems. These contaminated environments become breeding grounds for resistant bacteria.

Climate change also alters ecosystems, creating conditions that favour the survival and spread of resistant bacteria. In addition, rising temperatures and changing weather patterns increase the prevalence of infectious diseases, necessitating more frequent use of antibiotics, which further accelerates the development of AMR.

Addressing AMR aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly those related to health (SDG 3), clean water (SDG 6), responsible consumption (SDG 12), and climate action (SDG 13).

Sustainable practices in healthcare, agriculture, and environmental management are essential to mitigate the AMR crisis.

Investors can play a role in combating antimicrobial resistance by:

  • Supporting sustainable and responsible practices in industries that contribute to the problem.
  • Investing in companies that prioritise reducing antibiotic use in agriculture and developing alternative methods for disease prevention.
  • Investing in companies focused on developing new antibiotics, rapid diagnostic tools, and alternative therapies.
  • Funding initiatives that prioritise sustainable healthcare and environmental practices. This includes supporting technologies for wastewater treatment and antibiotic residue management.

Investors can also influence corporate behaviour by engaging with companies to adopt better practices. Supporting initiatives that promote antibiotic stewardship and investing in public health infrastructure can also contribute to mitigating AMR.

Antimicrobial resistance is a pressing global challenge that threatens human health, economic stability, and the environment. While antibiotics are a foundational pillar of medical progress, their overuse and misuse have led to the growing threat of AMR.

This challenge, driven by practices in healthcare, agriculture, and environmental management, poses severe risks to public health and ecosystems with potentially significant economic costs.

Addressing AMR requires a comprehensive approach that includes stronger regulations, increased innovation, and global collaboration.

Governments and industries must support initiatives aimed at reducing antibiotic use, developing new treatments, and improving public health infrastructure.

Investors can play a pivotal role by driving sustainable practices, engaging with companies to improve stewardship, and directing capital toward innovation in antibiotics, diagnostics, and alternative therapies. Through collective efforts, we can mitigate the impact of AMR and safeguard the effectiveness of antibiotics ensuring a sustainable and resilient future.

Anastassia Johnson is a researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute at WTW, an innovation network of asset owners and asset managers committed to mobilising capital for a sustainable future.

 

One response to “Why investors must engage on the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance”

  1. Mike Clark

    How do we separate the responsibilties of government and non-financial regulators from that of the finance sector?

    Societal risk and financial risk are different risk paradigms.

    A financial regulator is never going to go big on AMR. So what exactly are the transmission channels here? Do we need “accepting lower profitis/expected returns” to be key to progress? Seems we are learning that in the context of climate change?

Leave a Comment

Pension funds confront the question of who owns AI

Pension funds confront the question of who owns AI

As the use of AI within asset owners evolves, organisations are grappling with the governance question of where the strategy and accountability sit. Darcy Song looks at the treatment of AI organisationally within a number of high-profile funds, including OTPP, AustralianSuper, CPP and Norges Bank.

Sort content by

KLP shows the active side of passive

Norway’s fund for local government employees and healthcare workers, KLP, abides by strict internal ESG principles. Sarah Rundell looks at how this translates to investments in emerging markets, its view of indexes and a concentration of manager relationships.

Washington State’s secret sauce

A big contributor to the long-term top decile performance of the Washington State Investment Board has been its high allocation to private markets. But it is not just the high allocation that sets the fund apart from its peers, it’s also the nature of the relationships with its GPs. Amanda White speaks to retiring CIO Gary Bruebaker about the fund's secret sauce.

Nest picks managers most able to adapt

More than 40 asset managers were shortlisted for a private credit mandate for the £8 billion UK DC plan, NEST. It chose three. Sarah Rundell looks at the process and structures, and what the fund looked for in a manager.

Looking less at the scoreboard

Traditional performance monitoring reports do more harm than good, argues Phil Edwards, who suggests a more effective monitoring framework shifts the focus away from performance numbers and towards the fundamental characteristics of the stocks held in the portfolio, perhaps borrowing some elements from private markets.

The reason behind fee falls

Fees have declined significantly in a number of asset classes since 2016. Fund of hedge fund fees for example have fallen by more than a quarter in that time. Kathryn Saklatvala from bfinance discusses why.

Wisconsin’s data solution

David Villa, CIO of the $110 billion State of Wisconsin Investment Board is worried about the outlook for returns. As a result he’s significantly underweight sovereign bonds in favour of cash. But he’s also positioning the organisation to do better analytics for more complicated portfolios, another result of a low return environment. The fund is working on at least five data and technology projects and has hired a chief technology and operations officer.

Previous