Understanding complexity at BCIMC

On the first page of the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BCIMC) annual report is a flow chart titled “complexity and connections”, outlining how the Japanese earthquake and subsequent tsunami and nuclear disaster sent shock waves through the global economy.

Understanding complexity and both the risks and potential opportunities that can arise from an increasingly connected but heterogeneous global investment environment is central to the future plans of one of Canada’s largest institutional investors.

BCIMC manages more than $92.5 billion in assets for 40 clients, including 11 public-sector pension funds in British Columbia, Canada.

 

Rethinking and getting real

Chief executive and investment officer Doug Pearce says being a truly global investor that now invests in more than 43 different countries requires radically rethinking old investment approaches.

Sponsored Content

This involves both a re-evaluation of the way the BCIMC’s clients decide its strategic asset allocation, which will involve shifting from a conventional mean-optimisation approach based on modern portfolio theory to using aspects of thematic investing.

It will also involve increasing real assets, both as a reaction to increased client demand but also in response to a low-returns environment BCIMC believes will be here for at least the medium term.

BCIMC has set itself the ambitious target of having 30 per cent of total assets under management exposed to real assets by 2014-2015. To do this, it has targeted up to $1.4 billion in infrastructure commitments annually, $1.2 billion to private equity and $1 billion to real estate.

The private-equity, real-estate and infrastructure-and-strategic-investment buckets currently represent a little less than 25 per cent of the portfolio.

 

One bucket, two streams

This will also involve splitting its infrastructure-and-strategic-investment bucket into two streams: infrastructure and renewables.

The primary focus of the infrastructure stream will be on core infrastructure assets such as water, electricity and gas utilities, waste disposal and energy, including electricity generation, transmission and storage. It also encompasses transportation, including roads, railways, bridges and waterways.

Renewables will include timberland, agriculture and other sectors such as renewable energy.

 

Increasing internal capacity

BCIMC is also continuing to incrementally add to its internal investment team, which currently manages 65 per cent of assets in house, including 60 per cent of the public-equity allocation, all of its allocation to bonds and mortgages, and part of its private-equity, infrastructure and real-estate holdings.

By 2014-2015, the corporation will manage 70 per cent of assets in house, moving to 75 per cent by 2018-2019.

BCIMC has identified areas where it needs to increase its capacity, including the operational side of its private-equity and infrastructure programs, as well as in the development aspect of its real-estate portfolio.

The push to rethink its investment approach includes the internal investment team challenging conventional investment thinking and strategies, Pearce says.

“Right now we think a lot of that [modern portfolio theory] has broken down. Looking at 20-year histories of correlations and standard deviations in a global portfolio does not make a lot of sense to us,” says Pearce.

“We know we want to be in different markets for diversification, for returns and also because of where the growth is. The developed world is probably doing 2 to 2.5 per cent and emerging markets are much stronger in terms of GDP growth, which we think will eventually result in capital-market growth.”

“Looking in the rear-view mirror doesn’t make sense to us. We are looking at what we can do in these markets and we are trying to assess risk on a different basis other than volatility.”

Pearce notes that volatility is still an important measurement of risk, but the investment team is now challenging itself to look at risk in a much more holistic way, including what certain exposures are in the portfolio based on major investment themes.

BCIMC has been working closely with a global management consultancy to identify these emerging investment themes and where opportunities might lie.Pearce points to population growth, demand for food and energy, demographic change and global healthcare needs, and the rise of the consumer in Asia as some of the themes the investment manager has identified.It is an approach that looks beyond traditional asset buckets to looking at where in the value chain of a particular theme the best relative risk/return opportunities may lie.“The most important asset allocation decision is how much do we put into these thematic investment ideas versus what instrument we use such as if it is a bond or a stock. So, it changes the nature of asset allocation,” Pearce says.

BCIMC plans to also incorporate its thematic investment approach directly into its offering to clients. Currently the fund offers 65 pooled-fund options to clients that are typically asset class- or subset of asset class-focused.

The investment manager will launch thematic-based pooled funds that are not asset-class constrained.

Research and deploy

The investment team has identified healthcare and food production as two immediate areas that are requiring more research, with the manager combining its own research capabilities with those of its consultant.

Three years ago  BCIMC added 12 investment staff, forming its own in-house research team.

In addition, the corporation is bolstering its links with academia, collaborating with the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business on a two-year project to develop an approach to forecasting asset-class returns in the future.

Pearce says that while thematic investing approach identifies both opportunities and also seeks to identify exposure across the portfolio to these same themes, it increases the demand for better information and better technology.

BCIMC has flagged increasing its technological capacity so it can gain ongoing and timely information on the exposure of the portfolio to certain key themes.

“Technology is one of the two major inputs into the whole investment process here. We look at our portfolio in the traditional set of lenses, and what I am asking people to do is to look at the portfolio with different lenses,” he says.

“An example would be: what is our real exposure to China? There are a lot of European and North American companies that have extensive revenues that come from China. So, maybe we should be looking at the portfolio in terms of source of revenue exposure.”

 

Managing concentrations in exposures

Like other commodities-based economies, Canada is exposed to a potential slow down in the Chinese economy. Pearce says that managing concentrations in exposures is particularly relevant for the Canadian investor given finance, energy and mineral sectors accounting for 77 per cent of the Canadian equity market as of March 31,  according to internal BCIMC analysis using the TSX Capped Equity Index.

“If we look across all these sectors, we would find our exposures are pretty short in some areas, due to these types of companies not really being in Canada,” he says.

“We don’t have very many large food or healthcare companies, for example. There are a whole bunch of sectors we don’t really have much of and we believe they are growing fast in other parts of the world and it might be worthwhile for us to say, ‘ok, let’s diversify.”

Almost two-thirds of the total assets under management are in Canada, with the next biggest regional exposure the US at 18 per cent, Europe 7.8 per cent, emerging markets 7.6 per cent, Asia 4.1 per cent.

 

BCIMC combined-pension return for its clients

PERIOD

RETURN

COMBINED-MARKET BENCHMARK

Year to March 31, 2012

5.9%

3.8%

20 years

8%

7.9%

15 years

7%

6.8%

10 years

6.2%

5.9%

5 years

3.3%

3.3%

 

 

 

BCIMC’s asset allocation as of March 31 2012 was:

Public equities 45.0%

Fixed income 26.8%

Real estate 14.4%

Infrastructure and strategic investments 5.3%

Private placements 4.4%

Mortgages 4.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

The Austin advantage: Texas Teachers talks optimism, innovation and growth

Jase Auby, TRS's celebrated CIO, explains why TPA doesn't fit with its culture; why community push back on data centres could turn out to be an investor advantage, and argues the case for continuing to invest in fossil fuels. Top1000funds.com sat down with the CIO in his Austin office for an all-encompassing conversation.

Sort content by

TRS fuels up for energy surge

The $155 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas is restoring its target allocation to energy, as experts see favourable conditions due to higher US oil production and continued reliance on fossil fuels. This is at odds with other investors divesting from fossil fuels.

Adventist Health’s risk appetite grows

The $6 billion Adventist Health System is considering more risk as it grows and is seeking to gain from efficient processes. The goal remains maximum effectiveness in provision of healthcare.

AP7 targets anti-climate lobbying

The $53.8 billion AP7 is using shareholder resolutions to push companies to reveal their true positions on the Paris agreement and other measures. Corporations are taking notice and changing.

Utah Retirement to pick PE managers

Utah Retirement Systems considers its strong balance sheet, history of long-term relationships with managers and nimble governance advantages as its search for GPs in private equity begins.

CalPERS manages outsized equity risk

The $335 billion California Public Employees' Retirement System warned this week that it is greatly exposed to a downturn in global equity markets, as it prepares to monitor active risk closely.

N. Mexico PERA adopts Wisconsin model

Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico CIO Dominic Garcia is headed down the path less travelled, employing a risk-parity and alpha strategy he learned with the State of Wisconsin.

Previous