Stopping traffic: Bankpension’s solvency strategy

As markets turn south, remaining solvent is the biggest challenge facing Bankpension, Denmark’s 1.6 billion (US$2.1 billion) pension fund. Chief investment officer Leif Hasager talks to Kristen Paech about the measures the fund has introduced to protect against downside risk.

Bankpension, the Danish pension fund for employees in the financial sector, is subject to strict regulatory requirements comparable to those applicable to a life insurance company.

These requirements, known as the “traffic light” system, are set out by the financial regulator, the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority (DFSA), and monitor the solvency of institutions.

The DFSA introduced the traffic light system in 2001 following the crash in the equity markets. The tests work on two basic scenarios: a “red light” under which pension funds must be able to take a 12 per cent decline in equity prices and a 0.7 per cent change in interest rates; and a “yellow light” where pension funds must cope with a 30 per cent fall in equities and a 1 per cent change in interest rates.

Late last year, the regulator requested life insurance companies and pension funds file further “extraordinary reporting” related to solvency and buffer levels, following continued turbulence in the markets.

Sponsored Content

Leif Hasager, chief investment officer of Bankpension, (pictured) says the regulator’s most recent requirements reflect the “red light” scenario.

When asked about the biggest challenges facing the fund in 2009, he says: “First and foremost, staying solvent; that’s number one. Number two is sticking to a long-term strategy, so that in the end when markets recover we are still well positioned.”

However Hasager says Bankpension is in “fairly good shape”.

“We are more or less immunised towards interest rate changes and if we look at all assets that are not interest rate sensitive (which is approximately half), we could sustain at least a 20 per cent drop in those assets without problems,” he says.

“We have a few complete write offs but I’d say the major part of our portfolio will bounce back sooner or later, so it’s short term very painful but longer term I’m not too worried about it.”

The fund offers four investment options to members, three of which offer “conditional guarantees” and one which offers an “unconditional guarantee”.

 

The conditional guarantees can vary according to interest rate conditions and other factors, while members pay a substantial premium for the unconditional guarantee.

The unconditional guarantee promises investors a return of 2 or 3 per cent, depending on when they joined the fund.

Approximately 50 per cent of the fund’s members and capital fall into the default fund – investment profile two – which has 50 per cent invested in bonds and real estate and 50 per cent in equities and equity-like investments.

About 10 per cent of members are in the high-risk option (profile four) and less than 2 per cent choose the bond-heavy strategy (profile three). The remainder (around 38 per cent) are in investment profile one, which has the same asset allocation as profile two but offers the unconditional guarantee.

Recently, Bankpension decided to hedge the downside risk in its unconditional guarantee option (profile one) by introducing interest rate hedging.

Hasager said the fund may make further adjustments to the profile later this year, once new rules on bonuses and solvency requirements are published.

In addition, Bankpension has formed a “strategic co-operation” with individual pension company letpension to establish a joint management company.

Under the terms of the agreement, the entities will remain separate but will share resources across the administrative functions.

“letpension is a fairly new company that is starting to sell life insurance policies to the financial institutions’ clients, so it’s not the employees, it’s the clients of the banks,” says Hasager.

“In that sense there’s no overlap between our customers and their customers, but of course we have the same financial institutions to service to a very large degree so that was the main reason behind this strategic co-operation. Of course, we see it as an opportunity to achieve more benefits of scale in the future.”

Bankpension provides pensions for 14,000 members across Denmark’s financial sector, predominantly small banks. The fund offers four investment options to members, three of which offer “conditional guarantees” and one of which offers an “unconditional guarantee”.

Asset allocation (30/11/08)

Derivatives 3%
Danish fixed income  32%
Emerging market bonds  4%
High yield bonds 8%
Developed market equities 21%
Emerging market equities 9%
Private equity 9%
Real estate  14%

Performance summary (2008)

Investment profile 1 -23%
Investment profile 2 (default)-23%
Investment profile 3 -8%
Investment profile 4 -33%

 

Leave a Comment

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

Scenario testing has put inflation risk front and centre at PMT, the Netherlands’ third largest pension fund, and it's driving the investor to take stock of the inflation protection it gets from infrastructure. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, chief investment officer Hartwig Liersch unpacks the risk, as well as another initiative where it's balancing concentration risk in the equity allocation without hurting returns.

Sort content by

PME’s path to recovery

PME, the €18.8 billion (US$25.6 billion) industry-wide pension fund for the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in the Netherlands, has seen its funding ratio fall 45 per cent over the last year. Kristen Paech talks to the fund about its recovery plan, including the decision not to rebalance equities, and the benefits of using a

CIC creates new investment teams, scouts opportunities offshore

As global markets nosedived and its initial investments soured, the China Investment Corporation (CIC) took the opportunity to reorganise its investment operations and focus on less risky investments at home and in Asia. Simon Mumme reports. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Equity bias thwarts Irish sovereign fund’s returns

Ireland’s €15.5 billion (US$20.6 billion) sovereign wealth fund, the National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF), has been highly exposed to the equity market malaise. Kristen Paech examines the fund’s investment strategy and the Government’s recent decision to use the NPRF to finance the recapitalisation of two of Ireland’s beleaguered banks. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

More in-house management means lower costs, risks for Finnish fund Ilmarinen

The 21.7 billion (US$28.7 billion) Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company is adopting a ‘back to basic’ approach to investment and relying on its internal investment team to steer it through unprecedented equity market volatility. Deputy chief executive, Timo Ritakallio, talks to Kristen Paech about the virtues of in-house management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UniSuper’s proprietary risk program challenges investment assumptions

UniSuper, the $23 billion Australian pension fund for those working in higher education and research, has developed an in-house risk budgeting and factor analysis program that monitors the extent to which the fund deviates from its strategic asset allocation, and ensure the fund’s active risk is allocated appropriately between managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2

NZ Super seeks opportunities amongst the wreckage

While it may not have liabilities to pay out just yet, the NZ$11.2 billion (US$6.26 billion) New Zealand Superannuation Fund is not immune to the liquidity pressures facing institutional investors across the globe. Kristen Paech talks to chief executive Adrian Orr about the challenges facing the fund, and the potential investment opportunities. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content