North Carolina to consider DC option

The trustees of the $65 billion North Carolina Retirement Systems will vote on whether to introduce a defined contribution plan when the board meets on Jannuary 20, one of the significant recommendations by the Future of Retirement Study Commission.

The Commission, which was created by the board of trustees and tasked with reviewing all major aspects of benefit design, has recommended the choice between a defined benefit and defined contribution plan for all current and future employees, and automatic enrolment in a supplemental DC plan for future hires.

The NCRS’ current defined benefit plan has been under some scrutiny, with its consultant Ennis Knupp recommending in June last year that it was in need of a formal asset liability study and that for the size and complexity of its investments, it was chronically under staffed.

Last financial year was the first in the fund’s history that the General Assembly did not make the full annual required contribution.

At the upcoming board meeting, trustees could either pass the motion requesting the General Assembly adopt some or all of the Commission’s recommendations, or make additional recommedations of its own, but the decision to make any changes to the pension system ultimately lies with the General Assembly.

If the commission’s recommendations are adopted, the state retirement system will manage and regulate the DC plan in conjunction with existing 401(k) or 457 accounts, which are provided by Prudential Retirement.

Sponsored Content

The commission did not recommend a financial services company for the vendor of the new plan, instead suggesting the state invite proposals.

The commission recommended the default investment for the DC plan should be a lifecycle or target date fund, while also suggesting it should have the same employer costs as the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (TSERS) and the Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS).

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

War in Ukraine threatens net zero targets

The UK's BT Pension Scheme's CIO Wyn Francis reflects on the pressure war in Ukraine will put on investors net zero targets.

SWIB’s priorities in a tougher investment landscape

Edwin Denson, executive director and CIO at State of Wisconsin Investment Board talks to Top1000funds about changes in investment strategy, noting that active management, and the need to take on more risk for the same return are guiding principles.  

QSuper and Sunsuper merge to form new institutional giant

The long awaited merger between the two Australian super funds, QSuper and Sunsuper, came into force on February 28, creating Australia’s second largest super fund. The newly formed A$220 billion Australian Retirement Trust is aiming to double its size by the end of the decade, according to CEO Bernard Reilly.

Sweden’s recipe for success: Active, low cost, ESG

CEOs at Sweden's four buffer funds link stellar returns to low costs, sustainability and active management.

PMT builds out its ESG screening and engagement program

PMT, the Dutch fund for metal and technical workers, has just increased the screens guarding its equity and bond allocations from ESG laggards. It is also increasing its engagement with companies to try and build climate awareness.

Railpen: Why internally run engagement makes the difference

Railpen, well known for its belief in the cost and control benefits of inhouse management visible in its large in-house team has also built up an internal engagement team to better align stewardship with its ESG objectives, particularly ambitious net zero targets.

Previous