North Carolina to consider DC option

The trustees of the $65 billion North Carolina Retirement Systems will vote on whether to introduce a defined contribution plan when the board meets on Jannuary 20, one of the significant recommendations by the Future of Retirement Study Commission.

The Commission, which was created by the board of trustees and tasked with reviewing all major aspects of benefit design, has recommended the choice between a defined benefit and defined contribution plan for all current and future employees, and automatic enrolment in a supplemental DC plan for future hires.

The NCRS’ current defined benefit plan has been under some scrutiny, with its consultant Ennis Knupp recommending in June last year that it was in need of a formal asset liability study and that for the size and complexity of its investments, it was chronically under staffed.

Last financial year was the first in the fund’s history that the General Assembly did not make the full annual required contribution.

At the upcoming board meeting, trustees could either pass the motion requesting the General Assembly adopt some or all of the Commission’s recommendations, or make additional recommedations of its own, but the decision to make any changes to the pension system ultimately lies with the General Assembly.

If the commission’s recommendations are adopted, the state retirement system will manage and regulate the DC plan in conjunction with existing 401(k) or 457 accounts, which are provided by Prudential Retirement.

Sponsored Content

The commission did not recommend a financial services company for the vendor of the new plan, instead suggesting the state invite proposals.

The commission recommended the default investment for the DC plan should be a lifecycle or target date fund, while also suggesting it should have the same employer costs as the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (TSERS) and the Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS).

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

OMERS sharpens strategic focus

OMERS Strategic Investments (OSI) is more than the international co-investment arm of Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), it is the vehicle which the system uses to shape and implement several key parts of its strategic plan. OSI is one of five investment groups that fit under the OMERS Worldwide brand. The other four groups

Future Fund’s single
total portfolio

For the past five years David Neal has been integrating the vision of “one team, one portfolio” into the culture of the investment team at the $77-billion Future Fund. This has now been set in stone – well, porcelain – with coffee cups bearing the moniker used by staff throughout the organisation. The slogan is

Hedging and risk reduction pay off at ATP

The seriousness with which the Danish pension fund ATP takes hedging paid off last year, with the fund recording its best ever return. A combination of the hedging activity and a deliberate move to substantially reduce its risk meant the fund weathered the European storm despite the fall-off in interest rates. The 579-billion-Danish kroner ($98.4-billion)

UN fund enters 21st century

With total portfolio costs of only 15.3 basis points, the $43-billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund is one of the most efficiently run pension funds in the world – not bad for a fund that has investments in 41 countries and 23 currencies. This year it embarked on an operations overhaul to bring even

Missouri’s risk-based
asset allocation

A decision by two of Missouri’s public pension plans to adopt a straightforward risk-based approach to asset allocation garnered their best result in two decades last year, while also providing investment staff with the autonomy to react quickly to changing market conditions. The board overseeing the Public School Retirement System of Missouri (PSRS) and the

Wyoming takes
the passive route

Investors are taking an increasingly sophisticated view of their passive equity allocations, aiming to capture the benefits of a range of risk premiums, while also lowering the volatility and improving the risk/adjusted returns – all at a considerably lower cost than active management. Wyoming Retirement System (WRS) turned to risk-premium mandates as part of a

Previous