Managers perform for Texas Teachers

A row of boots sits for sale in a Dallas, TX western wear store. Shot with Canon EOS 5D.

The selection of investment managers contributed almost three-quarters of the 168 basis points of excess returns the $146 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas generated in the 12 months ended September 30, 2017.

Individual manager outperformance added 122 basis points of outperformance as Texas Teachers posted a 12.9 per cent return for the year, exceeding its benchmark of 11.2 per cent.

In a presentation to the fund’s board this month, Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting partner Steve Voss said this was Texas Teachers’ second-strongest rolling one-year return ever, “second only to roughly a 2010 timeframe, when markets were just starting to improve following the crash [and] you had a lot of credit investments that were” excelling.

Individual managers of real-asset portfolios did “exceptionally well”, Voss said, along with private equity managers, directional hedge funds and stable-value hedge funds – “all added value quite notably above their benchmark”.

About 20 per cent of Texas Teachers is invested in real assets, where the managers the fund selected returned 10.9 per cent for the year to September 30, compared with the benchmark of 6.1 per cent.

The bulk of those real assets are in real estate and energy, natural resources and infrastructure.

Sponsored Content

“Those areas have done exceptionally well,” Voss said, adding that the fund’s investment management division (IMD) has done “a great job of adding value and finding good managers in that space”.

Voss said asset allocation had also helped the fund exceed its benchmark; for example, the decision to underweight US Treasury bonds contributed 49 basis points of outperformance.

There was lost value as well. Over the year, the fund was overweight absolute return strategies, which cost about 14 basis points of value. Overall, however, asset allocation contributed 41 basis points of the total value added for the year.

“The average underweight the last year for US Treasuries has been -2.3 per cent,” Voss said. “The decision IMD has made to underweight Treasuries has had quite an effect; it’s had a half-per cent impact for this past year. That one decision alone has been remarkably additive.”

Voss warned against letting the current low-volatility environment cause complacency to creep in and lull investors into accepting investment risk that might be “greater than one should be taking on”.

“Volatility has been at an all-time low,” Voss said, and for the last three years has been about 5 per cent for the fund’s benchmark portfolio.

“I don’t recall a time…when we’ve seen volatility as low as this,” he said. Looking forward, volatility is expected to be significantly higher, in the 10 per cent to 14 per cent range.

“It’s been a very quiet, low-vol period,” Voss said.

The value of Texas Teachers’ assets stood at $146.2 billion at September 30, 2017, up from $133.2 billion a year earlier. Investment earnings added $16.1 billion to the fund’s value over the period, taking total investment earnings for the fund over the last five years to $54.2 billion, with net withdrawals for the year of just over $3 billion.

Voss said TRS has outperformed its investment benchmark in 14 of the last 20 quarters.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

Pension funds and social housing: a perfect match?

Pension funds and social housing: it looks like a perfect match as schemes in the United Kingdom seek long-term, index-linked cash flows and housing associations, the not-for-profit providers of this type of affordable housing for low income households, hunt the long-term finance they can’t access via banks. Broad residential housing represents just 1 per cent

Learning from Danish funds’ stable alternative

Despite upturns in equity and bond prices sending 2012 returns into double digits at many large Danish funds, it appears that successfully implementing infrastructure initiatives remains the holy grail of Danish institutional investing. Instead of merely basking in 12.9-per-cent annual returns, Industriens Pension, for instance, used its 2012 results announcement to make a commitment to

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Norway’s GPFG enters the property game

Last May, when Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global bought 4 per cent of the Formula One motor racing group from private-equity firm CVC Capital Partners, its goal was clear. The sovereign wealth fund, which invests Norway’s oil revenues, wanted the inside track on Formula One’s IPO in Singapore, scheduled for June. Instead, the GPFG’s foray

Investors add to credit cycle

Reaching-for-yield — the propensity to buy riskier assets in order to achieve higher yields — is believed to be an important factor contributing to the credit cycle. This Harvard Business School finance working paper analyses this phenomenon in the corporate bond market. The paper’s authors Bo Becker and Victoria Ivashina show evidence for reaching for

Gunning for diversity, dynamism and due diligence

The new low-return, high-volatility environment requires broadly diversified portfolios, dynamic decision-making and rigorous due diligence, which is beyond the internal capacity of most small funds under $10 billion, warns Russell Investment’s global chief investment officer Peter Gunning. He says smaller funds must decide if it is cost effective and even possible to internally manage investment

Previous