Denmark’s PenSam introduces new climate index to solve tech tilt

Like many sustainability-focused investors, $17 billion PenSam, one of Denmark’s largest labour market pension providers, has found itself overweight US tech stocks in recent years. Not only is technology a low emitting sector, it’s also producing many of the solutions for reducing emissions by creating efficiency of production.

“We had more than 10 per cent in the IT sector,” recalls Mikael Bek, head of ESG at PenSam which introduced a climate benchmark for the equity portfolio in 2020. Over the last three years, the index successfully reduced carbon and supported positive returns in the equity allocation, but had also developed an increasing tilt to the IT sector where stocks like Amazon and Microsoft dominate the equity markets and take up a large share of the index.

“This was not the idea of the benchmark – we wanted a market portfolio with a climate tilt,” says Bek.

To resolve the problem, PenSam has just introduced a new, sector neutral climate index developed with S&P and applied to the whole $7-8 billion equity portfolio.

The index is constructed around a defined level of carbon budget linked to UN IPCC estimates on the required emission reductions to limit global warming to 1.5ºC compared to pre-industrial levels. Broadly, the benchmark has a 70 per cent reduction in emissions compared to the parent benchmark and must also further reduce carbon emissions annually by 7 per cent. If companies cannot achieve this themselves, PenSam “will make changes in the benchmark to reach its goal,” says Bek.

Alongside weighting companies in the index according to how much they cut their emissions, the bespoke index includes a higher weighting to companies having a positive climate impact. “Decarbonization is moving too slowly if we are going to reach the Paris goals. Just look out of the window! Everyone wants to continue to live the same life and emissions reduction is a very difficult task.”

Sponsored Content

The only caveat to the sector neutral approach is a large underweight to the energy sector – energy accounts for just 0.5 per cent of the index compared to 5 per cent in the underlying, broad-based benchmark. That underweight has been passed or redistributed to other sectors, he says.

“Our underweight to the energy sector is deliberate because we believe the fossil fuel sector will have problems in the long-run. We say we have a time horizon of 20-30 years ago and we need to reduce our exposure to fossil fuels,” says Bek.

In another element, the bespoke index also includes exclusions to tobacco and controversial weapon groups. Companies with poor human and labour rights are also taken out of the index.

PenSam also has a bespoke index for its corporate bond allocation that includes an exclusion on fossil fuels.  But the investor is currently exploring developing the index further, seeking a climate benchmark for the bond portfolio.

Challenges reporting on climate

Climate reporting and conforming to new regulation is one of the most challenging elements of sustainability at PenSam. In 2025/2026 the investor will report emissions in its audited, annual report for the first time. “When something goes in your annual report it is audited, that’s serious and this is a new ball game that informs our licence to operate” he says.

The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, CSRD, require large and listed companies report on the social and environmental risks they face and on how their activities impact people and the environment. Pension funds have to comply with both CSDR and Sustainability Financial Disclosure Regulation, SFDR, concludes Bek.

Leave a Comment

More from this fund

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

Scenario testing has put inflation risk front and centre at PMT, the Netherlands’ third largest pension fund, and it's driving the investor to take stock of the inflation protection it gets from infrastructure. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, chief investment officer Hartwig Liersch unpacks the risk, as well as another initiative where it's balancing concentration risk in the equity allocation without hurting returns.

Sort content by

Total portfolio management pays off at LPPI

The Local Pension Partnership pooled fund has saved £113 million in costs since inception. But the real benefit, according to chief executive Chris Rule, is the governance structure which allows the outsourced provider to manage the total portfolio. He spoke to Amanda White about the power of total portfolio management.

Norway’s Folketrygdfondet seeks to spread its wings

Why Folketrygdfondet, the asset manager of Norway’s Government Pension Fund Norway’s NOK 330 billion ($31.4 billion) allocation to domestic and Nordic fixed income and equities, wants to spread its wings.

CalPERS’ 2030 strategy centred on private market build

Private markets are the cornerstone of CalPERS’ 2030 goal and strategic destination which will include building capabilities inhouse for direct investing. A number of new appointments, including Daniel Booth and Anton Orlich, have boosted the skills in the team. Amanda White spoke to CIO Nicole Musicco.

New Jersey eyes private credit opportunities

The investment team at New Jersey Division of Investment explain why they are bullish on private credit, and flag trends in increasingly large capital raises by external managers. This risks pension fund assets not being allocated but sitting with 'asset gatherers' more focused on management fees.

CalPERS’ leadership trio on culture, mission and responsibility

CalPERS stands out among its global peers with three women leading the organisation as chair, CEO and CIO. Amanda White spent time (on zoom) with the group to find out what drives the leadership team and how collaboration and a shared mission are creating an innovative investment culture.

Finland’s VER warns impact of higher rates on private markets still unknown

Timo Löyttyniemi, CEO at VER is focused on how the fund's asset managers have handled the impact of higher interest rates in private markets. It's about to become apparent if they've successfully hedged interest rate risk; re-financed, and reduced total leverage levels to manage higher borrowing costs.

Previous