CalPERS: Lessons from CIO departure

The CalPERS board is considering whether to require a new CIO to transfer all of their personal stock holdings into a blind trust while they are a CalPERS’ employee. The move follows the resignation of Ben Meng as CIO last year after an ethics investigation related to some of his personal investments.

In an interview at the Conexus Financial Chair Forum, President of CalPERS Henry Jones said there had been lessons from the experience of Ben’s departure and the board was discussing whether a blind trust was appropriate for the CIO going forward.

CalPERS requires all senior employees to declare their personal investments via a form 700, and to recuse themselves from any decisions around investments they may hold.

Jones said following Meng’s departure the board now shares the responsibility of hiring the fund CIO with the CEO, Marcie Frost. In addition the CEO is required to keep the board informed of any form 700 concerns.

“Hiring a new CIO is an area of high priority for CalPERS right now, we have had multiple CIOs over the past few years,” Jones said. “The experience has changed the governance process and how the board and CEO work together to hire the next candidate. One thing I have to say upfront is our CEO was very transparent with the board in the hiring of Ben Meng and equally so last year when Ben decided to resign.”

Jones said the right candidate would not only have the right investment qualifications but also experience in the public arena.

Sponsored Content

“The board is focused on the qualifications needed to run a fund of CalPERS’ size, but not only do we need a CIO with the right mix of investment experience, we need a leader who is up to the challenge of being in the spotlight of this very public position.”

Selecting a new CIO is one of two key priorities for the CalPERS board in 2021. The other is the asset liability study which is conducted every four years and includes assessment of the fund’s risk appetite and appropriate strategic asset allocation.

“Our CEO shared our calendar year return of 12.4 per cent at our January board meeting, which was different from our fiscal year return and shows our investment strategy is working,” Jones says. “Much of our focus this year is on the four-year cyclical ALM study and the process will take a fresh look at capital market conditions, our liabilities and risk appetite, and the investment opportunity set available to us as a long-term investor.”

He said the board’s next step was to select a new strategic asset allocation that offers the best risk and return trade-offs. Private equity, which has been a big focus for the fund, will continue to be part of that mix.

The ALM process may also result in the selection of a new policy benchmark and a change to the targeted discount rate, currently at 7 per cent.

The CalPERS board is made up of 13 members and every two years adopts a self-evaluation process.

In the last evaluation, ideas around improved governance, effectiveness and oversight of the system were identified across five areas: board curriculum, roles and responsibilities, meeting materials, code of conduct, and insight tools.

“We have had a few accomplishments already to strengthen the board education program and held five workshops in the last fiscal year,” he said. “Last summer while the US saw a lot of unrest around racism, we held a workshop on unconscious bias and that’s a good example of how the board remains current on relevant subject matters that impact our members.”

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

Danish fund cuts managers for better ESG

The €9.5 billion DanishPædagogernes Pension, PBU, is in the process of consolidating the number of managers in its listed equity portfolio. The decision at the fund - which has around 10 large, focused equity mandates - is linked to an ambition to reduce the number of companies in the portfolio in the belief that fewer companies in the 42 per cent actively-managed equity allocation allows greater ESG oversight.

The impact of technology on investments

Harshal Chaudhari recently sidestepped from his role as company-wide CIO at IBM, looking after $150 billion in pension assets, to a new role as the tech giant’s chief analytics officer. He spoke to Top1000Funds about the strategy he ran at the pension fund, his wider thoughts on the global economy and the impact of technology on the investment world.

QSuper: standing out from the crowd

QSuper CIO, Brad Holzberger, has long stood out from his peers by loading up on long-term government bonds and even the recent sudden collapse of yields, as investors started pricing in slower growth, hasn’t deterred him from sticking with this asset class. The retiring CIO of one of Australia's largest funds about expectations.

ADIA boosts internal active fixed income

The $700 billion Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, ADIA, is boosting its internal fixed income capabilities and scaling up capacity to run active strategies in-house as it simplifies the portfolio to become more fleet-of-foot.

Finding risk: First State Super

A decade of ultra-low rates and mediocre growth does not mean that every year will yield low returns for investors, according to Damian Graham, the CIO of First State Super one of Australia's largest institutional investors. He talks about how to get enough risk in the portfolio.

Caisse Geneva’s approach to risk

The pension fund for the Swiss Canton of Geneva runs a fundamental investment strategy shaped around harvesting the premia. The fund's CIO, Gregoire Haenni, mindful of heightened risk in the equity allocation because of the late cycle.

Previous