New economy needs big public sector

A larger and better public sector is necessary to achieve economic prosperity, reach full employment and meet the needs of the population, according to former US Treasury Secretary, Larry Summers.

“We need government with more market power, a larger function, and that is more competent in carrying out the tasks required,” Summers said.

Summers, who is President Emeritus of Harvard University and was Treasury Secretary under President Bill Clinton, said it is the “task of the centre left to recognise it won’t just work out if everyone stands back”.

He spoke on the “profound structural changes that will and are transforming economies and to which policymakers need to respond” and said it is essential that government plays an active and forceful role in ensuring there’s demand for all the goods introduced.

“The industrial world has a problem it hasn’t acknowledged. People are saving more, there is inequality, and at the same time, capital goods are less demanded,” he said.

“How do we sustain prosperity? There needs to be greater acceptance of fiscal deficits, and policies regarded as imprudent will become necessary. There have to be significant and strong levels of demand, and this needs to be a concern of progressives because a strong economy is the path to the best social progress.”

Sponsored Content

Summers recently wrote a book on the end of economies built on mass-produced goods, The Post-Widget Society: Economic Possibilities for Our Children. He said it is not possible to rely on the private sector for economic success. For example a social network satisfies none of the assumptions for economic success; it has asymmetric information, imperfect information, and a monopoly position.

“We need a larger public sector that is going to need to do more to employ everybody. So much of economic debate focuses on strengthening the widget makers – [but] that doesn’t matter,” he said.

“In the US, the share of workers in manufacturing is lower than the share of farmers was in 1950. If you look at the jobs that the Bureau of Labour Statistics projects will grow, three out of four of the top categories are a version of a nurse or medical technician. We need a larger more effective public sector.”

Summers also called for more responsible nationalist approaches to global economic issues including corporate tax evasion and intellectual property.

“It is right that countries concerned with innovation pursue the protection of intellectual capital internationally,” he said. “Making sure the capital can’t run and hide and avoid tax plus intellectual capital issues are global economic concerns.”

But he said discussions about global economic cooperation should be broadened, rather than a handful of leaders at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.

“The agenda we have is an elite agenda. We need an agenda that resonates with the concerns of those that have never heard of Davos,” he said.

“I’m pretty sure if we don’t find a way for global economic cooperation that resonates with local people, management of the economy largely outside the widget sector, and sustained economic growth, then there are elements of populism and authoritarianism that are ready to fill any vacuums.”

Summers was former chief economist at the World Bank and Director of the National Economic Council for the Obama Administration. He was speaking in Sydney at the McKell Institute.

 

Asset Owner:World Bank

Leave a Comment

The ‘space economy’ is a legal and literal vacuum for investors

The ‘space economy’ is a legal and literal vacuum for investors

The looming SpaceX IPO has put the spotlight firmly on the so-called ‘space economy’, but asset owners have been urged to exercise caution about investing in a sector that still resembles the wild west, with no legal or governance framework to protect capital. That’s not to say money will not be made, but it might not be in the areas investors first expect.

Sort content by

PGGM’s journey to invest for risk, return and impact

The €268 billion Dutch pension provider PGGM is leading its global peers when it comes to shaping 3D portfolios based around risk, return and impact. Piet Klop, head of responsible investment discusses the challenges of investing for outcomes.

CPP drives new corporate framework for emission abatement

CPP Investments’ proposal for projecting the capacity of companies to abate greenhouse gas emissions can help corporate boards and executives better understand the least and most polluting elements of their business, and steer investor capital to industries with lower emissions, said Richard Manley, managing director, head of sustainable investing, CPP.

Cambridge endowment talks inflation and divestment

Rising inflation will make it more challenging to meet the £4 billion Cambridge University Endowment Fund’s 5 per cent return hurdle, said Tilly Franklin, CIO, speaking at Sustainability in Practice. Franklin oversees a multi asset, diversified portfolio that is managed externally. The fund has significantly outperformed over the long term (10-year returns are 11 per

CalSTRS factors in net zero implications

CalSTRS is putting in place building bricks to meet its 2050 net zero pledge in a process that underscores the complexity and size of the task in hand.

Active engagement needs research, cadence and materiality

Investor engagement and stewardship programmes seek to change corporate behaviour, reduce risk and shape positive real world impacts. But experts notice that to be most effective investors need to ensure they are seeking to change the most material and important issues.

Hydrocarbon investment could avoid global recession

United States policy has quietly encouraged India and other countries in Asia to buy Russian hydrocarbons to avoid a global recession, driven by energy and food shortages, according to US government adviser and Russia expert Stephen Kotkin. While “no one wants Russia to get away with” invading Ukraine, an energy supply shock prompted by sanctions

Previous