Germany’s largest pension fund VBL ups diversification; invests more abroad

VBL/Schafgans DGPh

VBL/Schafgans DGPh

Diversification is the new byword at Germany’s €70 billion pension provider Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder, VBL, founded nearly 100 years ago.

The country’s largest pension fund for public sector employees will steadily build out its allocation to private debt and equity, and is allocating more to foreign real estate after years of just buying property in Germany. VBL and has also increased its tilt to international equities over European stocks.

The diversifying strategy has come alongside a strategic overhaul that has transformed the team, organisation and investment process at the growing pension fund, however it deliberately avoids any uptick in risk or change to VBL’s net target rate of return of 5 per cent over time.

“We could target a higher return; we could take more risk, but it’s not necessary and this way we can increase the portfolio’s security,” says Michael Leinwand, VBL’s chief investment officer, speaking from the fund’s Karlsruhe offices in Baden-Württemberg.

The 21 per cent allocation to equity,  tweaked in favour of a larger allocation to international exposure and reduced exposure to European stocks, is now divided 40:40 between Europe and the US with the remaining 20 per cent of the allocation invested in Asia. Equally split between active and passive strategies, Leinwand says over time the ratio will likely tip to favour more active management.

“More active equity managers might be onboarded if they deliver alpha consistently,” he says.

Sponsored Content

In a similar vein, VBL has diversified its €10 billion allocation to real estate by increasing the international allocation. For many years, the pension fund almost exclusively invested in German residential property and retail premises like domestic grocery chain Aldi.

“We have defined a new strategy which means we will shift more and more to international markets. In the next five years, we expect to be in a situation where 60 per cent of the real estate allocation is in Germany, 25 per cent in Europe ex-Germany and the rest in the US with a little bit in Asia.”

In another source of diversification, the long-standing 4 per cent allocation to commodities, which is wholly invested in gold, may also be increased. Invested in Exchange Traded Commodities the portfolio is already a source of diversification as an alternative to government bonds, and an inflation hedge.

“We only  assume an inflation compensation as a yield component to gold; it serves predominantly as  a diversifier. It could be increased to 5-6 per cent of the portfolio without having sleepless nights.”

Manager selection

VBL’s entire portfolio is managed externally apart from a 17 per cent allocation to sovereign bonds – although this is about to be handed over to external managers too. It means manager selection is a key focus for the team and shaped by a rigorous process.

VBL only invests with “leading investment management organisations” and avoids boutiques; it picks partners based on market performance, their extensive research capabilities and the ability to deliver alpha through the cycle. In return, managers benefit from a long-term partnership involving substantial mandates that also give VBL impressive pricing power.

“We don’t pick any assets ourselves,” he explains. “We set guidelines, define mandates and select the manager, but which assets they buy and sell, that is the duty of the asset manager.”

He argues that investment managers play an important role in risk mitigation too, especially at smaller pension funds.

It’s an issue that has come to the fore following the collapse of Germany’s dentists’ pension fund, €2.2 billion Versorgungswerk der Zahnärztekammer Berlin (VZB). The fund has begun legal action following losses in private market, naming its advisers, auditors, former executives and the state of Berlin over alleged governance and oversight failures.

“Governance and oversight is difficult at smaller pension organisations,” reflects Leinwand.

“Staff need to know what is happening in the asset class and have the same level of education as external asset managers; the pension funds need the backing of a proper organization and risk culture and have diversified asset classes in the portfolio to reduce the likelihood of accidents. It’s essential to bring people in with expertise, because at some point, these smaller pension funds will need the knowledge of professional asset managers.”

IS VBL increasing its allocation to defence? not really

After decades of spending as little as 1 per cent of GDP on defence, the German government plans to spend €650 billion on defence between 2025 and 2030 in response to today’s new geopolitical reality, opening up opportunities for pension funds to invest more in the sector.

Leinwand reflects that defence stocks already sit in the equity allocation. Another way to gain exposure to the sector is via buying government bonds, and he notes exposure also comes via the infrastructure equity allocation that could include allocations to companies in cybersecurity.

“This is the type of portfolio company that one of our fund managers could be invested in,” he says, mulling the possibility of establishing a specific defence mandate, although this is not on the agenda yet.

“My view is that it wouldn’t be easy for us to create a dedicated defence bucket – although one way we could do so is via buying and ring fencing a portfolio of equities.”

Leave a Comment

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

Scenario testing has put inflation risk front and centre at PMT, the Netherlands’ third largest pension fund, and it's driving the investor to take stock of the inflation protection it gets from infrastructure. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, chief investment officer Hartwig Liersch unpacks the risk, as well as another initiative where it's balancing concentration risk in the equity allocation without hurting returns.

Sort content by

Apollo: Integration crucial for Europe’s investment future

Tristram Leach, the London-based head of investments at Apollo, said a lack of integration among the fragmented European regulatory and market structures is making it harder for investors to deploy in the region. He warned that, without deeper coordination, Europe risks missing out on the global capital rotation.

Expect a 5-to-10-year wait for 401(k) plans to enter private markets

The risk of litigation and liquidity concerns mean America's 401(k) funds won't venture into private markets for five to 10 years, said T. Rowe Price's Michael Davis, speaking at FIS Oxford. But he said legislation has played a powerful role in shaping the US retirement industry.

APG private markets CIO articulates the value of being based in Asia

Dutch investor APG is showing its deep commitment to Asia by installing its chief investment officer of private markets in the Hong Kong office, a prime location from which to proactively source opportunities. The fund outlines its plan to increase allocation in infrastructure and private equity while integrating impact themes.

Risk depends on your mental model of reality

A lot of words have been written to explore what risk is, but Tim Hodgson of the Thinking Ahead Institute makes the case that risk looks different to different models of reality. This column is the first of a six-part series exploring risk management for investment systems, or ‘risk 2.0’.

Solving for retirement: All paths lead to more private savings

The most significant change to the superannuation and pension system is not the internalisation of asset management, or the shift to passive strategies, or the rise of private markets but the climbing support ratio globally, according to Michael Davis, head of global retirement strategy at T. Rowe Price.

CPP Investments, NBIM reflect on lessons from a 5-year transparency journey

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark has been a driving force in improved transparency of disclosures and reporting among global asset owners. As the project comes to its close after five years, two leading funds reflect on why transparency has been a clear focus for their organisations. 

Previous