Climate the No.1 priority for 2021

Cracked Ground From The Indian Subcontinent

Climate is by far the number one sustainability priority for investors in 2021 according to a poll of asset owners from more than 32 countries which came together for the Top1000funds.com online Sustainability event in March.

According to the polling at the event, 79 per cent of investors say climate is their number one ESG priority for the year, followed at a large distance by diversity (19 per cent) and labour rights (2 per cent).

The investors resoundingly said they thought the COVID-19 crisis had accelerated the need to address the sustainable development goals, with 87 per cent of investors agreeing this. This is up from the Sustainability conference six months earlier in September last year when 74 per cent of delegates said the crisis had been a conduit for addressing the SDGs.

The conference heard that sustainable bonds in emerging and frontier markets could unlock the growth in emerging markets, and could override volatile electoral cycles and target funds in social areas like education and climate change that have held back development with a material impact on growth.

Of the investors surveyed at the conference, 56 per cent of investors said they would invest in sustainable bonds in those markets in the next 12 months.

Sponsored Content

Of those that won’t, it was predominately due to only having an equities exposure in those markets, but also some investors were concerned the exposure would be too narrow (7 per cent).

The conference looked at diversity, equity and inclusion, with much attention being paid to DEI both internally and externally among asset managers by the investors attending the conference.

According to polling 75 per cent of investors have between 10-30 per cent women in the makeup of their investment teams. 20 per cent had between 30-40 per cent, and only 5 per cent had 40-50 per cent. None of the investors at the conference had more than 50 per cent women in their investment team.

Externally however, 59 per cent of the investors said that they hold their asset managers to account on DEI issues, with a further 18 per cent revealing they plan to in the next 12 months. A further 24 per cent just said they don’t.

Impact investing and the evolution from a risk/return to risk/return/outcome framework was also a theme discussed at the conference.

Investors were asked what percentage of their portfolio also looked at impact alongside risk and return and 38 per cent said 5 per cent of their portfolio, 25 per ent said in more than half of their portfolio, 19 per cent said in their whole portfolio, while 13 per cent were not pursuing impact at all in their portfolio.

The polling of investors revealed the importance of data when it comes to decision making in sustainability.

Investors were asked what most stands in their way to pursue more impact through their portfolio of public market assets, with 43 per cent said the availability of reliable and consistent data was standing in their way.

Others said it was the availability of sustainable investments at scale (19 per cent), a concern about giving up return (14 per cent) and communication with members and stakeholders (10 per cent).

For more coverage of the Sustainability Digital conference, including session recordings and stories, visit the content hub.

Leave a Comment

The dangers of funding sedition

The dangers of funding sedition

Scott Kalb and CalSTRS' Aeisha Mastagni discuss what is next for investor action in sustainability. They reflect on the dangers of funding sedition following the 6th January riots. Investors rarely consider the risk of investee companies financing extreme groups, but it threatens the very system on which institutional investment relies.

Sort content by

Engaging with Investors on ESG Issues

Bond issuers—including sovereigns, who represent 50 percent of the fixed income asset class—are faced with increasing scrutiny on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues from investors. Forums organized by the World Bank Treasury to promote dialogue between institutional investors and sovereign bond issuers have highlighted the challenges sovereign issuers face in engaging with investors on ESG topics and in communicating ESG-related information that investors consider financially material to their portfolios. This document provides examples, best practices, and action plans that can help debt managers enhance their capacity to engage with investors incorporating ESG information in investment decisions.

Portfolio Engineering

For decades, we have engineered scalable portfolios to help institutional investors achieve their goals. In the past, these goals have typically been financial (eg. return and risk targets), but now many investors are also seeking to achieve environmental and social impacts through their portfolios. We believe the best way to achieve both financial investment goals and these impact goals is through portfolio engineering that incorporates these objectives holistically, beginning with crisply defining an investor's goals, systematically looking across a variety of asset classes to find assets that are aligned with these goals, and then combining those assets to create a portfolio that is designed to achieve a high ratio of return to risk.

New Policy Concensus

We are now at a turning point, with Democrats controlling both legislative chambers and the presidency, and an emerging concensus among Democratic policy makers and their advisors that enables fiscal spending that is both significant in size and ambitious in scope. Later this year, we expect to see the first expansionary fiscal package centered around the pursuing long-term social, environmental, and competitiveness policy goals (following the more immediate COVID recovery package). In these Observations, we explore two key shifts in Democrats' thinking underlying these policy proposals, which we expect will be sustained well beyond this fiscal package.

Social Conditions Consideration

The ultimate goal of economic policy is simple and timeless - to ensure prosperity and maximise living standards. Broad macroeconomic measures such as GDP growth, the unemployment rate, and inflation had for decades been a good proxy of rising prosperity, so they have dominated economic policy making and are enshrined in most central bank mandates. But even before the COVID-19 crisis, it had become clear that traditional economic measures have increasingly diverged from social outcomes.

Secular Supply and Demand

Over the past two decades, China's secular rise dominated commodity markets, as its industrialization required a massive amount of raw materials to build up the country. As we consider the future, we see many reasons to be bullish on commodities tactically, but one of the most important secular factors will likely support industrial commodity demand for years to come: the shift in global economies away from fossil fuels and toward greener energy.

Diversity Impact Score

Throughout its history, the U.S. domestic Asset Management Industry, projected by PwC to grow to $71.2 trillion in assets under management by 20251, has exhibited an empirical lack of diversity with respect to gender and ethnicity within its ranks. Numerous studies have shown that Women and People of Color (“POC”) are underrepresented in the Industry, including a 2019 study commissioned by the Knight Foundation finding that Asset Management firms owned substantially or majority-owned by Women or POC managed only 1.3% of the Industry’s total assets under management.

Previous