Rebalancing at UTIMCO: Why investors should worry about corporate earnings

In today’s volatile and challenging markets, University of Texas Investment Management Co (UTIMCO), the $81.5 billion asset manager and one of the largest public endowments in the US, will maintain its counter-cyclical approach by rebalancing every month and going overweight in equity as it sees the market drop.

Following a predetermined set of thresholds, the investor is happier to be overweight because it is easier to tell when the market is cheap and buy in, than it is to judge if the market is expensive, and be underweight.

“We will go overweight when we can, buying assets cheaply and ride that up: we rarely go underweight,” said president, CEO and chief investment officer Rich Hall in a recent board meeting at the fund’s Austin headquarters.

During the meeting, Hall also outlined his key concerns regarding the impact of policy shifts by the US administration on projected corporate earnings for 2025, describing a negative shift in earnings expectations due to lower growth, higher inflation and little added relief from the Federal Reserve.

Consensus numbers for the S&P 500 year-on-year earnings per share (EPS) growth estimates were as high as 15 per cent at the end of 2024, and it looked like the S&P would end the year at 6500 points. Key metrics signposted a constructive or neutral outlook for companies, and investors believed that the new administration would implement pro-business policies.

However, the market missed the magnitude of the impact of tariffs on trade and the economy. These numbers fell “off a cliff” in January this year, and are now as low as 9 per cent. Although Hall acknowledged that [9 per cent] is still growth, it is “not what it was,” and comes with higher levels of risk given enduring policy uncertainty.

Sponsored Content

Recessions happen when people ‘wait and see’

“There is a saying that recessions happen when people wait and see. The policy and economic uncertainty is causing consumers and companies to pull back on spending until they see what is going to happen,” he warned, adding that the probability of a recession increases as spending slows, and that a recession can become self-fulfilling until new facts emerge to break the pattern.

Moreover, he noted that despite the sharp fall in the equity market in April, the S&P 500 is still at elevated levels relative to the last ten years. This is a cause for concern for investors given the uncertainty that is still in the economy, and the fact that the higher the level, the bigger the potential fall.

During the last 12 recessions since World War 2, the median market fall in the S&P 500 has been 24 per cent and the median EPS fall has been 11 per cent. Modelling these averages to current levels if recession strikes suggests an S&P valuation of 4500, triggered by a decline in earnings and a compression in valuation multiples.

Getting stuck in the mud with stagflation

Hall also flagged his concerns regarding stagflation – one of the most difficult environments for asset values – given the fall in GDP growth and the rise in inflation.

“You can get stuck in the mud and that’s not a great place to be.” He noted that inflation expectations have spiked higher across the board and it remains to be seen to what extent tariffs will push it higher still. Meanwhile, inflation uncertainty has slowed the pace of rate cuts by the Fed, with the idea that any cuts will come later, not sooner.

Despite the high levels of volatility in the last 12 months, UTIMCO’s portfolio has earned 8.6 per cent, exceeding its benchmark by over 2 per cent, and the asset base has grown to $81.5 billion.

The endowment has 26.2 per cent in public equity, 27.8 per cent in private equity and 6.4 per cent in directional hedge funds. It has a 5 per cent allocation to long treasuries, 2.3 per cent in cash and 10.8 per cent in stable value, plus a 2.8 per cent allocation to natural resources, 4.8 per cent infrastructure, and 8.8 per cent real estate. Five per cent is allocated to strategic partnerships.

Leave a Comment

Dutch pension funds face tech reckoning, warns central bank

Dutch pension funds face tech reckoning, warns central bank

The Netherlands' Central Bank has warned the country's pension funds that their €150 billion ($177 billion) investments in tech companies, representing almost 43 per cent of their listed equities portfolios and 8 per cent of their total balance sheet, is at risk from a potential AI bubble.

Sort content by

The future is quant

The pace of technological change and advances in machine learning and quantitative methods will result in a “shake out” in investment management according to Campbell Harvey, Professor of Finance at Duke University.

CalPERS board’s divestment dilemmas

The merits of tracking divested dollars, and the value of data illustrating what the pension fund has missed out on was the topic of much debate at the December CalPERS board meeting. In 2021 the fund will review six divestment programs across tobacco, firearms, coal, Iran, Sudan and emerging market equity principles.

Active US large cap adds nothing

Active investing in US large caps has detracted value from US pension fund portfolios and exposures should be indexed, according to new research by CEM Benchmarking. This could result in huge cost savings and have implications for how pension funds spend their active budget.

Strategic factor investing

Institutional investors should consider factor investing as a strategic decision, according to a new paper from Dirk Broeders at Maastricht University and Kristy Jansen from Tilburg University.

Is factor investing still working?

A large number of long-only multi-factor strategies have performed disappointingly over the past three years. Some have called into question the usefulness of solutions based on factor diversification but recent research by EDHEC suggests this doesn’t hold up against an even remotely serious investigation.

Danish fund cuts managers for better ESG

The €9.5 billion DanishPædagogernes Pension, PBU, is in the process of consolidating the number of managers in its listed equity portfolio. The decision at the fund - which has around 10 large, focused equity mandates - is linked to an ambition to reduce the number of companies in the portfolio in the belief that fewer companies in the 42 per cent actively-managed equity allocation allows greater ESG oversight.

Previous