Wilshire paints dire picture for state retirement systems

Wilshire Consulting’s annual report on US state retirement systems reveals near-universal underfunding, leavened only slightly by the 19.5 per cent rally in global equity markets in the eight months since its cut-off date.


Of the 57 state retirement systems that reported actuarial data to June 30, 2009, every single one had a market value of assets less than their pension liabilities. The average of these underfunded plans had a ratio of assets-to-liabilities of just 58 per cent.

Wilshire estimated that the pension asset-to-liabilities ratio of all 125 state pension plans in its survey was 65 per cent in 2009, down “sharply” from an estimated 85 per cent in 2008.

However the consultancy stressed that the lag caused by the time it took actuaries to calculate a plan’s liabilities made the situation look worse than it would now be.

“It is important to view the latest published funding ratios in the context of depressed market levels as of June 30, 2009. Since then, global equity markets have rallied 19.5 per cent in the eight months through February 26, 2010, which we would expect to result in higher funding ratios today if the funding data were available in real-time.”

A gradual reduction in the state systems’ home country bias was affirmed by the Wilshire report.

Sponsored Content

During the last nine years, the average allocation to non-US equities increased from 13 per cent to 18.2 per cent, while allocations to US bonds decreased from 31 per cent to 27.1 per cent.

Average allocation to both real estate and private equity increased slightly. An average 4 per cent allocation to real estate in 2000 rose to 6.5 per cent across the 125 plans by 2009, while the average private equity exposure more than doubled from 3 per cent to 7.4 per cent.

“As expected, the increased allocation to equities and away from debt from 2000 to 2009 has caused the average state pension plan to move towards a slightly higher expected return and risk allocation along the efficient frontier,” the Wilshire report authors wrote.

“Increased allocations to real estate and private equity from 2004 to 2009 provided slightly increased return and lower risk for the average state plan.”

Wilshire found that the median state pension fund had an expected long-term return of 6.9 per cent, which is 1.1 per cent less than the current median actuarial interest rate used to determine ongoing liabilities.

“Under Wilshire’s return forecasts, none of the 125 state retirement systems are expected to earn long-term asset returns that equal or exceed their actuarial interest rate assumption. This is a dramatic change compared to the 23 state retirement systems that were expected to earn long-term returns that equalled or exceeded their actuarial interest rate assumption in last year’s report,” the authors wrote.

The report did point out that Wilshire’s assumed returns for each asset class gave no consideration to the potential value added by successful active management.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethinking investment performance attribution

As asset owners move away from silo-based investment decision making, their performance attribution systems also need to evolve. The Alberta Investment Management Corporation AimCo, the C$70 billion arm’s length investment manager for public sector assets in Alberta, Canada, has implemented a new performance attribution system based on how managers actually make their investment decisions.  

Benchmark design for an active investment process

Choosing the appropriate benchmark for active managers is a common debate among institutional investors. Norges Bank Investment Management has produced a “discussion note’ on the benchmark design for an active investment process, in which it introduces a flexible modelling framework that aims to incentivise each portfolio manager to utilise their stock-picking skill.   The benchmark

SSgA focuses on innovation not assets

For Scott Powers, president and chief executive of State Street Global Advisors, assets under management is not a measure of success – the manager is currently the world’s fourth largest with around $2.5 trillion. Instead it is the ability to provide value for clients in meeting their objectives – whether it be matching liabilities, creating

Pension funds put pressure on G20 tax reform

Pension funds are becoming vocal ahead of the G20 leaders summit next week, reiterating the need for action over tax reform, and encouraging world leaders to consider financial reform that encourages long-term investing. The UK’s Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, which is a collaborative shareholder engagement group of 61 local authority pension funds with combined

G20 urged to develop policies to support long-term investment

The Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University has identified several of the key barriers to pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds adopting more effective long-term and sustainable investment strategies, and is preparing a communiqué to the upcoming meeting of the G20 to convey its concerns and its policy requirements. FIS, organised and hosted

Future Fund focuses on finding the best people

Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, the A$101 billion Future Fund, has just upped the stakes in not only attracting the best co-investment deals from fund managers, but in its bid to attract the world’s best investment professionals. Two months ago the fund’s long serving chief investment officer, David Neal, become chief executive in name (following the

Previous