US funds favour global equities allocations

The home country bias of US public pension plans is diminishing, with the average allocation to US equities, falling from 42.3 per cent to 38.1 per cent from 2003 to 2008.

In that same time period the asset allocation to international equities has increased by 5.9 per cent to an average of 18.8 per cent, according to research by Wilshire Associates.

Managing director at Wilshire Associates, Steve Foresti, who directs the investment research at the firm, said the trend towards a global opportunity set for US public pension plans was a positive move.

“Each plan should use the global equities opportunity set as its starting point, and then be able to clearly articulate why its allocation is different from that opportunity set,” he said. “There are valid reasons why the plan’s investment may not look like the global opportunity set but you must know why you’re doing it.”

He said a larger number of Wilshire clients were looking at a 50:50 allocations to equities.

Sponsored Content

“I will be shocked if the trend to international equities doesn’t continue,” he said.

Wilshire surveys 125 state funds for its annual March report, which showed that funding levels for the median fund had fallen from 96 to 84 per cent.

However only about 59 of those plans had figures to the end of June 2008, so Foresti said the worst is yet to come in terms of reflecting the most recent losses.

The report showed total pension assets of these funds was $803.6 trillion and total liabilities was $1,040.6 trillion.

“Defined benefit plans are very complex structures. Actuarial statements are useful but they are backward looking, you need to look forward to acertain a plan’s health,” Foresti advised.

“You can say now when there are difficult times you have too much allocated to equities, but your role as plan sponsor is to find something in the future,” he said. “One of the lessons recently has been a painful understanding of what plan sponsor’s own risk tolerance is, and it may change behaviour and asset allocation in the future.”

Asset allocation of US public funds

Asset class 2003  2008 change %

US equities  42.3  38.1  -4.2

Non US equities 12.9  18.8  5.9

US bonds  35.2  26.7  -8.5

Non US bonds  1.4  0.9  -0.5

Real estate  4.0  5.9  1.9

Private equity  4.2 5.6  1.4

Other  4.0  4.0

Source: Wilshire Associates

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous