US endowments interested in outsourcing to multi-managers

A significant proportion of US endowments and other non-profit funds are at least “moderately interested” in outsourcing their investment management to a multi-manager model in the wake of the global financial crisis, according to a new survey by SEI Investments Company.The survey results, published last week in the US, show that the non-profit sector of the institutional investment market has some unique challenges and concerns when compared with pension funds and other institutional investors.

Most, for instance, have concrete spending programs requiring at least 4-5 per cent a year of total investment assets to maintain their sponsoring organizations’ commitments.

The survey, of 177 executives overseeing asset pools ranging between $25 million and more than $1 billion – with just over 50 per cent between $50 -300 million – showed that the major concerns going forward were:

  • making asset allocation decisions in conjunction with organizational finance decisions (62 per cent)
  • maintaining appropriate liquidity in the investment portfolio (49 per cent)
  • ongoing cash management (44 per cent), and
  • inflation hedging (44 per cent).

Only 28 per cent of respondents said they had immunized a portion of their portfolios to better support spending policies and avoid liquidity challenges. But another 23 per cent said they were considering introducing such a program.

SEI, which offers both traditional asset consulting services and multi-manager products, asked the non-profits, none of whom were clients, to define their investment governance according to one-of-three models: 56 per cent said they had an asset consultant to assist internal professionals on manager selection and oversight; 31 per cent said they had an internal team, without a consultant, to choose and oversee all managers and investments; and 13 per cent they had outsourced the CIO function to a multi-manager.

The SEI report notes that several high-profile firms have recently been offering their multi-manager services, specifically to the non-profit sector as an alternative to using an asset consultant. The researchers therefore asked the organisations which use an asset consultant about their intentions. A total of 54 per cent said they had “ at least a moderate level of interest in better understanding the benefits of an outsourced approach”.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous