DC plans must look at governance and design

Towers Watson’s Roger Urwin and Gordon Clark from the University of Oxford are finalising their fourth collaboration on global best practice for defined contribution plans. Amanda White spoke with Roger Urwin about the inefficiencies in plan design.

The financial crisis highlighted a lot of inefficiencies in investment markets and the strategies used by pension funds around the globe. The bulk of attention has been directed at asset allocation, asset correlations, liquidity and the role of alternatives. But Roger Urwin. Towers Watson’s head of global investment content – a role that contemplates investment strategy from the clients’ perspective – believes an equal amount of attention should be directed at governance and plan design.

“Pension funds can’t be effective without good plan design, and that’s not settled yet,” he said. “Plan design refers to how the fund works which includes daily dealing and pricing and a lot of those structural points are not settled yet. This is a multi-year type of evolution.”

He says there are many “cracks all over the world” and US public pension funds are one of the more obvious.

Urwin and Professor Gordon Clark, from the University of Oxford, are writing their fourth paper on global best practice for defined contribution plans which looks at governance and plan design.

Sponsored Content

Urwin believes the biggest thing that has to happen is a change in the mindset of pension funds to “investing through retirement not to retirement”.

“When you look at it this way, the key thing about defined contribution plans is they don’t have a cohesive framework between the member and the investment of pension funds.”

He says this lack of engagement between the two creates a problematic investment delivery.

“The individual member doesn’t have the financial sophistication to get an outcome they have trust in. Funds can communicate but the member mightn’t be listening or understanding enough. People are struggling with the super fund proposition, it is [a] counter-intuitive type offer.”

To this end Urwin is an advocate of the “nudge principal” or auto-enrolment, so that members have to opt-out not opt-in.

“This is a multi-year evolution to the culture to enable stronger super fund behaviour and better member behaviour.”

Linked this is better governance in the investment team, which for most funds is a combination of the executive team and investment board.

He questions the quality of the non-executive members of pension fund boards, and quotes Jeremy Cooper, chair of the review into the governance, efficiency, structure and operation of Australia’s superannuation system, who believes pension fund boards should have the same tests as corporate boards.

Urwin, who has been at Towers Watson, or more accurately Watson Wyatt, for the past 20 years, recently stepped down from his position as head of the group’s think tank, the “thinking ahead group”.

He will continue in his role as head of global investment content but will also take up a two-day a week advisory position at MSCI Barra.

Fellow-founding member of the thought leadership group, Tim Hodgson, will take over as head of the group which over the past eight years has explored pension fund issues such as risk budgeting, extreme risks and governance.

While focusing on broad investment research, Hodgson’s papers include investment efficiency, and he is a member of the global investment committee.

“The industry has so many interesting dimensions to it, to be able to operate with several different perspectives is fascinating,” he said. “People who know me know that this is not a winding-down, taking this particular challenge. Risk management is at a fascinating point, it needs to become more sophisticated.”

Urwin has been head of investment content since he handed the global head of investment consulting baton to Carl Hess in July 2008, a position he had held for 13 years.

His position as head of investment content is an “individual” or “free-ranging” role and external to Towers Watson, Urwin is also a member of the CFA board.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous