The flaws in traditional risk measures

William Browne, New York-based managing director of Tweedy, Browne Company, discusses the flaws in the traditional measures used to monitor risk and explains to Kristen Paech why leverage is the road to financial hell.

The Aramaic word hobha means both ‘sin’ and ‘deb’, and according to the managing director of Tweedy, Browne Company, it suggests that “the road to financial hell is debt”.

The uncertainty of financial markets is the underlying driver behind the value manager and investment adviser’s aversion to leverage and penchant for companies that have above-average dividend yields, an established history of paying dividends and reasonable valuations.

William Browne, New York-based managing director of Tweedy, Browne, agrees with the philosophy that measures used by the majority of the investment management industry to evaluate risk, such as value at risk (VaR), the Gaussian copula function and covariance matrix, are fundamentally flawed.

These formulas drove investment professionals to “heap on debt on a small capital basis because of a false sense of confidence”, he says.

Sponsored Content

“Mathematical finance is in the business of trying to eliminate uncertainty,” Browne says. “Practitioners thought they could remove uncertainty to such a degree that they didn’t need to spend much time worrying about it.”

However Browne says that rare events are “simply not that rare, they seem to occur with rather constant frequency”.

Investors should accept that there is never going to be certainty because markets are driven by people and people are “reliably unreliable”, he adds.

The attitude of invincibility, or “99 per cent confidence level” that uncertainty had been taken out of the equation justified enormous amounts of leverage to turbo-charge returns, and ultimately led to the downfall of the likes of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, Browne says.

The traditional risk measure of VaR failed to identify the risks inherent in the investment banks prior to their collapse.

According to Browne, in February 2008 shortly before its collapse, Bear Stearns had a VaR of $62 million.

In August 2007, it had $400 billion in assets, $40 billion of which did not have a quoted market and $13 billion in capital. In other words, its gearing ratio was about 31 to 1.

Meanwhile, shortly before its demise Lehman Brothers had a VaR of $85 million. In February 2008 it had $785 billion in assets and $25 billion in equity, so was also leveraged about 31 to 1. Its short-term borrowings were $520 billion and long-term borrowings were $125 billion.

Rather than rely on leverage to boost returns, Tweedy, Browne invests according to five key principles outlined in a paper titled “What has worked in investing” that was penned in 1992 but updated this year.

These are: Low price in relation to asset value; low price in relation to earnings; a significant pattern of purchases by one or more insiders (officers and directors; a significant decline in a stock’s price; and small market capitalisation.

“If we can’t turbo-charge our returns by leverage, what we have to do and what we are driven to do is to look for even larger discounts,” Browne says.

“In essence, what you need to do is get a substantial discount between the price of a security in the marketplace and what the business is worth.”

A common misconception about value managers is that they are “financial scavengers”, Browne says, adding that the notion is “at best incomplete and for the most part inaccurate”.

“What we’re trying to do is buy good businesses,” he says. “We are trying to build a portfolio of 40 to 50 bets… or businesses that have financial characteristics in common. We look for diversification by business, by industry and by country. We have a healthy appreciation for the inability to predict the future.”

In line with this, Browne says the company does not try to buy the 10 best businesses, instead looking for high probability factors based on strong data.

“The only thing you can control is strategy and implementation,” he says.

Tweedy, Browne was founded by Forest Birchard Tweedy in 1920 as Tweedy & Co., a dealer in closely held and inactively traded securities. The firm’s 89-year history is grounded in undervalued securities, first as a market maker, then as an investor and investment adviser.

The firm has offices in New York and London, and counts 55 staff, with 13 looking after securities

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous