Tips for DC plan design

As more plan sponsors consider introducing defined contribution plans, Towers Watson encourages the deliberation of plan design, with the ideal scheme encouraging engagement, managing savings rates and investment elections as well as expenses and communication.

Towers Watson says to be successful a defined contribution plan must consider and manage participant engagement, savings rates, investment elections, employer contributions, distribution strategies, plan expense, and communication and education solutions.

Many plan sponsors fall short of their potential to deliver benefits despite apparent success in one of these areas, Towers Watson says.

To better understand what employers are doing to improve the success of DC plans during the past year, it surveyed 334 plan sponsors with combined assets of $386 billion, about 30 per cent of which had assets above $1 billion.

The survey found that many plan sponsors have attempted to better engage participants by designing DC plans that encourage participation, promote higher saving rates and educate employees about their investments.

It found that plan sponsors offering auto-enrolment have a much higher participation rate than those that don’t. Many plan sponsors that offer auto-enrolment also automatically escalate the contribution rate.

Sponsored Content

According to the survey, most plan sponsors are also offering a matching contribution which has been successful in improving participation because employees view it as an enticement.

But despite the positive impact of participation as a result of adopting certain plan design features, Towers Watson says further improvements are still needed if “DC plans are to fulfil their promise as an appropriate vehicle for retirement savings”.

“The practice of allowing plan design to shape and develop employees’ retirement plans has its limitations.

“This is because planning for retirement cannot be uniform for all employees, and employees are not always engaged. To ensure participants are on the road to success, plan sponsors must continue to provide information to help participants gauge how much they’ll need in order to meet their personal needs in retirement. Ensuring that participants have an arsenal of tools to effectively manage their retirement finances should be a near-term priority for employers.”

To access the full survey click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous