The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds

The world’s largest institutional investors are increasingly building their own home-region private equity programs, but turning to fund-of-funds for the rest of the world particularly when it comes to Asia, says a Hong Kong-based partner of the first fund-of funds to ever build a product covering that region.

Sally Collier, who recently moved to Hong Kong as a partner of Pantheon Private Equity, said the “mega buy-out” managers who enjoyed a heyday in 2006-7 often had global presences, large capacity and were relatively accessible for researchers.

However, those managers were “no longer flavour of the month”, and demand had now shifted to the less-leveraged players in the middle market.

“The challenge here is that these players might only be raising $1.5 to 2 billion per fund, and they are becoming oversubscribed,” Collier said. “They’re the ones that take serious resources to find and access.”

Many of these “growth-oriented” mid-market private equity general partners were popping up in China and India, Collier said, where there was really no buy-out market to speak of.

Pantheon launched its first Asian private equity fund-of-funds in 1994, and raised its last one in 2006, closing it at $800 million for the seven-year closed-end vehicle.

Sponsored Content

Collier defended the private equity practice of charging fees on committed capital before it was invested, saying that to do otherwise would encourage general partners to make deals no matter what.

“As 2007 progressed our managers slowed down on new investments, and it was that fee structure which allowed them to do that.”

The Pantheon partner did allow that more “fee discussions” were happening in the cost conscious age following the global financial crisis.

She cited the recent example of a Missouri-based institution bargaining a private equity manager into paying 80 per cent of transaction costs for deals made on its behalf, where the historical norm has been a 50:50 split between the general and limited partners.

One response to “The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds”

  1. It makes sense that funds of fund become a norm. It lower fees and ease of management will benefit investors.

    ifund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Poll results: Do CIOs of US public pension funds get paid adequately?

  mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The Caisse, Future Fund into infrastructure

Two of the world’s biggest institutional investors have recently made significant forays into Australian infrastructure, seeing opportunities in the country across a wide array of assets. Canada’s second largest pool of pension assets, la Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (the Caisse), has made a $139.2-million investment in five projects. Macky Tall, the fund’s

Cal pension reforms set to pass

Governor of California, Edmund G Brown Jr, has announced proposed legislation that outlines sweeping reforms to the state’s pension system, but appears to have stepped back from a proposal to create a hybrid pension plan. The hybrid defined-contribution/defined-benefit plan was proposed last year when Brown launched a 12-point reform package. It was widely opposed by

DB plans continue to slide

The funded status of US defined-benefit corporate-pension plans continued to worsen last year, despite plan sponsors increasing contributions by $70 billion, a new Mercer study reveals. Mercer found funding levels have slipped to 2009 levels, with the outlook for 2012 likely to extend the bleak news for plan sponsors. The funded status of pension plans

Super standard risk measure

Australian superannuation funds are now required to disclose a measurement of risk to fund members, with trustees encouraged to use a standardised measurement backed by regulators and industry peak bodies. The Standard Risk Measure will provide a rating of a fund’s investment option based on the likely number of negative returns this option is predicted

Robert Merton: the individual plan man

A retirement solution that focuses on outcomes and is customised for each participant cannot be met by existing defined-contribution designs, according to Nobel Prize-winning economist, Robert Merton, who advocates a “next-generation DC solution”. Merton, who is the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management’s distinguished professor of finance and resident scientist at Dimensional Fund

Previous