Texas Teachers rejects independent risk officer

The $105 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas has debated, and rejected, the idea of appointing an independent chief risk officer outside of the investment management division, with the board deciding oversight of risk is sufficient within its current practices.

The consideration of an independent risk officer, reporting to the executive director, is a hangover from a review by the Investment Training and Consulting Institute, which was hired by the fund chief audit executive to do a comparative study on the use of derivatives trading and external managers a couple of years ago.

As part of the ITCI’s recommendations it advised the TRS to consider creating a new chief risk officer who would report directly to the executive director and be segregated from direct oversight by the chief investment officer.

Action on this recommendation was deferred until the transformation of the investment division, as laid out in 2007 by the then new chief investment officer Britt Harris.

That transformation, which has included diversifying the portfolio by reducing the dependency on public equities and increasing the allocation to alternatives, adding alpha by more actively managing the portfolio, appointing new staff, systems and processes, has now been complete.

In a board debate it was decided the internal auditor, risk committee and the culture of the board which included trustees with investment knowledge was sufficient to oversee the investment division and its risks.

Sponsored Content

Some of those functions and procedures, including the independent risk committee, were not in place at the time of the original recommendation.

Meanwhile the fund has appointed Brian Guthrie as its new executive director to replace Ronnie Jung from September. Jung has agreed to serve as executive liaison to the TRS board during a period of transition to the end of January 2012.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous