Teachers argues against private placement voting rights

The $C87 billion Ontario Teachers Pension Plan (OTPP) is arguing for the protection of investor voting rights in corporate transactions, as one of its private equity funds is fighting the effects a private placement by an investee company may have on the voting results in a second stage amalgamation transaction.


OTPP is urging Canadian securities regulators – the Ontario Securities Commission and the Alberta Securities Commission – to disallow companies from voting newly issued shares acquired in private placements with the apparent purpose of swaying the outcome of takeover bids.

OTPP is an investor in the ARC Energy Funds which are seeking an order to address the “improper” effects that a private placement by Profound Energy Inc. to Paramount Energy Trust, issued in connection with Paramount’s take-over bid for Profound, will have on the voting results in a second stage amalgamation transaction.

The funds are seeking orders from the regulators to restrict Paramount’s ability to vote the shares it acquired in the private placement, which Paramount has indicated it will vote in order to reach the threshold to approve the amalgamation.

The funds contend that the rights of shareholders in Profound have been thwarted by the inappropriate structure and tactics used in this transaction and could set a harmful precedent.

Senior vice-president of public equities at OTPP, Wayne Kozun, said the plan was concerned about the issuance of shares on a private placement basis in anticipation of a merger or acquisition, particularly when the votes attached to the shares may alter the balance of voting on a corporate transaction.

Sponsored Content

“Permitting the use of structures by bidders to circumvent normal voting thresholds would be at odds with the reasonable expectations of shareholders, and would seriously undermine investor confidence in, and the integrity of, the Canadian capital markets,” Kozun said in a letter to the regulators.

He said the pension plan supports a petition to regulators from ARC Funds to prevent Paramount from using shares gained in a recent private placement to vote in favour of its proposed takeover of the company.

The Calgary-based ARC energy funds together hold more than 11.5 million Profound shares, which constituted approximately 31 per cent of the outstanding shares of Profound prior to the private placement to Paramount.

On March 31, 2009, Paramount and Profound jointly announced the signing of a support agreement, pursuant to which Paramount made a take-over bid for all of the outstanding shares of Profound, for a combination of cash and Paramount trust units, valued at that time at C$1.34 per Profound share.

In connection with the bid, Profound issued a private placement provided exclusively to Paramount, through the issuance of special warrants priced at $0.75 and convertible one-for-one into Profound common shares, which, upon conversion represented a pro forma 19.9 per cent ownership interest in Profound.

Concurrently, Profound adopted a shareholder rights plan, which restricted the acquisition of 20 per cent or more of the shares of Profound, and severely limited purchases by existing shareholders with an interest already above 20 per cent.

The ARC funds believe that Paramount should not be permitted to vote the newly issued private placement shares in favour of the amalgamation.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why politics and pension fund management don’t mix

Thomas P DiNapoli was given a little scare in the recent US mid-term elections but, in the end, was returned fairly comfortably to his position of New York State Comptroller and sole trustee of the New York State pension fund. What happens next, though, may be more interesting. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

How turbulence measures can improve performance

Will Kinlaw, managing director of portfolio and risk management group at State Street Global Markets in Cambridge, tells Amanda White why new ‘turbulence’ indexes, measuring volatility and unusualness of returns, can guide investors in adjusting risk exposures and so improve returns.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Sovereigns reign best on 3-legged stool

The optimal asset allocation for Sovereign Wealth Funds is a state-dependent allocation to three building blocks: a performance-seeking portfolio, an endowment-hedging portfolio, and a liability-hedging portfolio, according to research conducted by the EDHEC-Risk Institute. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Florida basks in sunny performance

The $109 billion Florida Retirement System Pension Plan remains in its rosy position as one of the US’ best performing funds, exercising its scale to effect with a total expense ratio of 32 basis points for the financial year 2009-10.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

From the editor – November 2010

November 2010 In the first of a (brief) monthly video address editor of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Amanda White, observes the common challenges facing institutional investors around the globe.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Climate-change investors damn US weakness

A group of more than 250 institutional investors has damned individual country national policies, particularly highlighting inadequacies in the US, as preventing more private capital flowing into climate change-related investments. The collaborative stance comes ahead of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous