SWFs could help global stability: forum

SWFs, as long-term investors, could play a countercyclical role in providing global financial and economic stability, the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds concluded last week in Beijing.

In a statement, the Beijing Communiqué,  issued after the forum ended, the secretariat said delegates “felt strongly that the Santiago Principles remain a valid, robust, and transparent framework for SWF investing and urged recipient countries to utilise the Principles to maintain openness towards foreign investment, and guard against discrimination of SWFs compared to other institutional investors”.

In his address to the forum, Li Keqiang, vice-premier, State Council of the People’s Republic of China, said the world was undergoing major adjustment and transformation. “It is important to promote global economic recovery and prosperity by addressing the uneven development in the north and south countries,” he said.

Lou Jiwei, chairman and CEO of the CIC, urged the forum to work together and with other countries to promote a non-discriminatory investment environment for SWFs while continuously contributing to the recovery of the global economy and financial stability. The group was also addressed by Zhou Xiaochuan, governor, People’s Bank of China.

Delegates reaffirmed the importance of the forum for better understanding of the Santiago Principles and SWF activities during the post-crisis phase. The forum agreed to a permanent secretariat funded by members, and this would be based at the International Monetary Fund for a transitory period.

Next year’s forum will be in Mexico in May, and the 2013 meeting will be in Oslo, Norway.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous