Specialised short positions challenge beta behaviour

Long/short funds with specialised short positions have greater beta convexity and present greater liquidity strain in rebalancing, according to new research by Morgan Stanley.

The research, by Martin Leibowitz and Anthony Bova, which extends earlier work on beta convexity in long-only funds, looks at the beta convexity, or how a portfolio’s beta changes with equity market movements, in long/short funds.

It concludes that the type of short position taken by a long/short fund will affect the beta convexity, and that there are certain types of long/short funds that can have large beta variances and fundamentally different beta response patterns.

In normal markets, typical long/short funds, or those with the more common short position described as “short a long” position, exhibit beta behaviour similar to long-only funds having comparable beta values.

But the research shows portfolios with certain specialised short positions that are more like “long a short” where a declining equity market generates both higher profits and higher levels of short exposures, will have larger beta variances. They will also have highly variable betas, and may require large liquidity reserves for rebalancing purposes.

“Their beta response would be beneficial in trending markets, but they could generate significant portfolio losses in reversal-intensive markets,” the research says.

Sponsored Content

It also points out that it is “often unappreciated that a ‘rebalancing reserve’ of some size is needed to maintain beta value in declining markets”.

For example after a 30 per cent equity decline, a 60/40 fund would need to purchase 7 per cent of equity to rebalance to its original 0.6 beta. Funds with higher beta variance would need higher rebalancing reserves, the research says.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous