Shareholder influence under question: ICGN conference

The ability to appoint and dismiss company board directors is the most important shareholder right according to an overwhelming majority of delegates at the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) annual conference, who were more cautious on whether shareholders could actually influence corporate governance once they had the right to vote.

Delegates at the conference, which was attended by more than 430 institutional investors and their service providers in Sydney, Australia this week, believe the prime purpose of shareholder rights is to ensure the accountability of boards.

Through interactive sessions at the conference, the delegates voted that the most effective way to incentivise the best boardroom behaviour was to have more diversity on the board, and more truly independent directors.

However while the conference talked a lot about the right to vote, only slightly more than half of the delegates had faith that once shareholders had the right to vote that they could sufficiently improve corporate governance in companies, according to an impromptu vote of delegates, by Anita Skipper head of corporate governance, Aviva Investors UK.

The key to improving corporate governance, according to delegate votes, was more active and engaged shareholders, while mandatory disclosue of share owners engagement policies, resources and actions was the key to getting share owners to act like owners.

The feedback also found that 78 per cent of delegates believe that mismanagement of conflicts of interest contributed to the global financial crisis.

Sponsored Content

Suggestions for improving the management of conflicts of interest including the disclosure of all significant conflicts to shareholders and how they have been dealt with, and exclusion of conflicted directors from all discussions and voting issues where they have conflict.

ICGN has members in 45 countries with a collective funds under management accounting for more than $10 trillion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous