Roller-coaster ride for US corporate plan funding

While US corporate pension funds enjoyed their best month this year, in September, they remain chronically under-funded, according to the latest figures from Mercer Investment Consulting.

Largely thanks to an average return of 9 per cent from equity markets, the funding deficits of S&P 1500 company plan sponsors declined by a total of US$79 billion during September. However, they still stood at an aggregate of $428 billion at the end of the month.

In the past six months, the average corporate fund has been on a roller-coaster ride with its funding status and concerns remaining, with only three months to go before most plan sponsors have to do their next measurements.

Gordon Young, Mercer’s head of ‘integrated retirement financial management’ in the US, said that the aggregate funded status of US pension plans had moved 18 percentage points in the past six months – down from 84 per cent last December, to 71 per cent in August, and back up to 76 per cent last moth.

Following the good equity market rises enjoyed by most funds in September, there was continued concern about market volatility for the fourth quarter, he said.

Pension fund liabilities are valued using AA-rated bond yields, so the slightly higher yields translate into slightly lower plan liabilities, boosting the funds’ positions further.

Sponsored Content

Mercer points out that in an environment of increased funded status volatility, more importance needs to be placed on governance processes that allow investment committees to implement asset allocation changes effectively and efficiently.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Experts mull strategies in slow growth climate

Speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Oxford University’s Rhodes House Fiona Trafford-Walker, director of consulting at Frontier Advisors argues that Australian investors are operating in a changed environment and need to “get used to slower economic growth.” Speaking as part of an expert panel on how the continued environment of slow growth and low

Macro diversification: How do investors diversify risk?

“Geopolitics does matter and how to navigate geopolitical events on a portfolio is challenging,” argues Tom Clarke, partner and portfolio manager at William Blair speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Rhodes House, Oxford University. In a session dedicated to macro strategies for investors to best navigate today’s complex investment universe and diversify risk, Clarke argues that “hiding” from

Oxford Professor urges urgent European reform

The University of Oxford’s distinguished Professor of Economics David Vines predicted the ongoing crisis in Europe will turn into a “train wreck with implications for investors” unless governments undertake significant reforms. He urges for large write downs of the sovereign debt of southern European countries, a loosening of austerity in those countries and a significant

Indexing pressure improves active management

A new study of active and indexed-based mutual funds shows the impact of different countries’ regulatory and financial market environments. The study finds that the average alpha generated by active management is higher in countries with more explicit indexing and lower in countries with more closet indexing. The evidence suggests that explicit indexing improves competition in the mutual fund

Investors need to revamp portfolio construction

Investors should re-consider their investment processes in order to achieve the needed “step-change in efficient portfolio construction” in a low return environment, the chief executive of the A$109 billion ($83 billion) Future Fund, David Neal, says. “It is the investment process that turns the universe of opportunities into a portfolio, and right now that process

Investors need to rethink operating model

A neat little story of investment flows, asset allocation changes, and relationship and service demands is emerging from the third annual Top1000funds.com/Casey Quirk Global Fiduciary CIO Survey. If you’re a CIO of an asset owner what that means is more control but also more responsibilities and the demands of more internal resources. For managers it

Previous