Benchmarking ESG changes behaviour

The power of benchmarking funds on sustainability is demonstrated by the fact 171 property companies and funds surveyed in the 2012 GRESB benchmarking report reduced GHG emissions by 6 per cent – this is a reduction of 432,000 metric tons of CO2, the equivalent of removing 85,000 cars from the road.

The Global Real Estate Sustainability benchmark, an industry-led organisation supported by institutional investors including the Swedish AP funds, AustralianSuper, Ontario Teachers, USS, Norges Bank, PGGM and ATP, is the only sustainable benchmark that captures nearly 50 data points measuring sustainability, including environmental and social factors. The aim is to assess and reflect the sustainability performance of an institutional investor’s real estate allocation.

According to the report, the 2012 results show that real estate investors and managers are sharpening their focus on sustainability issues. Of the respondents, 60 per cent collect and report energy consumption data, compared to just 34 per cent in 2011, and 51 per cent of respondents include green building certificates in their portfolio. The 171 funds that were in the survey in both 2011 and this year reduced energy use, GHG emissions and water consumption.

Further the “green stars” reduced all of those outputs by more than the overall group.

Piet Eichholtz, chairman of the GRESB Foundation and professor of real estate finance at Maastricht University, says only if you start measuring things will you improve them.

“There are ways to make the industry accountable, including government regulation and pointing the finger at the industry, but only the industry itself can see that if it makes money things will really change, it’s a profit motive,” he says.

Sponsored Content

The number of survey members has increased from 19 to 35 in the past year, with the amount of institutional capital now $3.5 trillion (up from $1.7 trillion).

Eichholtz says it is important that the number of participants has increased, especially in the US. The real estate sector is responsible for about 40 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions and for 75 per cent of electricity consumption in the US alone so accountability with regard to sustainability can have a huge impact in this sector.

“This is being taken more seriously. It means there are more funds that have information and can do something about it.”

The 2012 survey has been broadened to include more social and governance aspects, more details on sustainability and more checks.

“Now we ask if they people did something, what they did. The current survey is a lot deeper and more robust than surveys in the past.”

The 2012 benchmark looked at 36,000 properties worth $1.3 billion from 443 respondents.

The survey weights 34 per cent to management and policy and 66 per cent to implementation and measurement.

“The survey asks providers if they have the infrastructure in place – the management, systems and strategy – to improve sustainability,” Eichholtz says. “We question the industry about getting that translated into action, sustainability reduces costs and better performance for investors. The traditional approach to sustainability was finger waving, but that only gets you so far. What we do is more productive and more positive.”

The survey divides companies and funds into four quadrants – green starters, green talk, green walk and green stars. The number of green stars is about 20 per cent, the same as last year, while 55 per cent were considered green starters.

However there is room for improvement. 40 per cent of the property companies and funds are still considered green starters with limited disclosure of sustainability performance towards the investment community. This represents substantial upside potential in reducing opportunities costs

The survey points to two examples of “exemplary reduction targets and achievements”.

Investa Property Group, which has achieved significant cost savings since 2004 including a 31 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and a 30 per cent reduction in electricity use; and Hermes Real Estate investment Management which set a carbon reduction target of 40 per cent 2020, and has already achieved that in 2012.

The GRESB scorecards for participants will be available this week.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous