Record losses for UK DB plans underscored by reliance on markets…

Five consecutive days leading into March were the most volatile on record for UK final salary pension schemes since accounting standards were changed in 2001, reflecting the risks associated with funding dependence on investment markets.

Aon Consulting, which measured the knock-on effect of volatile markets as measured by company accounts, found the combined deficits for the UK’s 200 largest defined benefit (DB) schemes between 26 February and 4 March, as calculated by the Aon200, were: £38 billion; £41 billion; £68 billion; £73 billion and £56 billion.

Marcus Hurd, head of corporate solutions at Aon Consulting in London, said volatile times such as these highlighted the need for every company to carefully balance its own risk appetite and cash management situation to find its optimal solution.

“Pension scheme deficits can only be funded by two sources – investment returns or contributions,” he said.

“Every company faces a difficult task in balancing the two approaches, because increased reliance on investment returns also often comes with increased risk.”

Hurd said company directors were facing a roulette wheel of pension scheme deficits.

Sponsored Content

“The levels of changes we are seeing are frightening even the hardiest finance director. A cool head and knowledge of all the options available are essential in these difficult times,” he said.

“We are seeing swings of unprecedented proportions at the current time. With one half of companies about to formally report their position at March 31, this is a real concern.”

However he said while pension scheme losses are obviously concerning, unless there is a risk the sponsoring employer goes into solvency it is worth remembering that pension schemes are long-term investors and have long periods of time to recover.

“It is only short term measurements, such as company accounts, that reflect the losses,” he said. “Sensible long-term financial planning and risk management should be high on the agenda.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous