Record losses for UK DB plans underscored by reliance on markets…

Five consecutive days leading into March were the most volatile on record for UK final salary pension schemes since accounting standards were changed in 2001, reflecting the risks associated with funding dependence on investment markets.

Aon Consulting, which measured the knock-on effect of volatile markets as measured by company accounts, found the combined deficits for the UK’s 200 largest defined benefit (DB) schemes between 26 February and 4 March, as calculated by the Aon200, were: £38 billion; £41 billion; £68 billion; £73 billion and £56 billion.

Marcus Hurd, head of corporate solutions at Aon Consulting in London, said volatile times such as these highlighted the need for every company to carefully balance its own risk appetite and cash management situation to find its optimal solution.

“Pension scheme deficits can only be funded by two sources – investment returns or contributions,” he said.

“Every company faces a difficult task in balancing the two approaches, because increased reliance on investment returns also often comes with increased risk.”

Hurd said company directors were facing a roulette wheel of pension scheme deficits.

Sponsored Content

“The levels of changes we are seeing are frightening even the hardiest finance director. A cool head and knowledge of all the options available are essential in these difficult times,” he said.

“We are seeing swings of unprecedented proportions at the current time. With one half of companies about to formally report their position at March 31, this is a real concern.”

However he said while pension scheme losses are obviously concerning, unless there is a risk the sponsoring employer goes into solvency it is worth remembering that pension schemes are long-term investors and have long periods of time to recover.

“It is only short term measurements, such as company accounts, that reflect the losses,” he said. “Sensible long-term financial planning and risk management should be high on the agenda.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous