Placement agents reject Californian reform

The institutional pull of CalPERS and CalSTRS is not enough for placement agents to change their practices, with a study of global placement agents revealing discontent over new legislation which requires them to register as lobbyists if they are working with public pension funds in California.

A study by Preqin shows that the placement agents sruveyed are so adverse to the new requirements that 84 per cent said they would be prepared to rely less on public pension funds as a result of the legislation.

According to the study, the prohibition of contingency fees was the most cited cause of discontent, while 78 per cent of firms responding will not be immediately registering placement agents as lobbyists which is a requirement of the new legislation.

A new bill, AB-1743 came into effect at the beginning of this year, and requires placement agents working with public pension funds in California to adhere to strict reporting procedures, requires they attend ethics training in the state capital, and prevents them from making campaign contributions.

Specifically this bill “would prohibit a person from acting as a placement agent in connection with any potential system investment made by a state public retirement system unless that person is registered as a lobbyist and is in full compliance with the Political Reform Act of 1974 as that act applies to lobbyists”.

According to the survey, many placement agents said they felt they were being punished for the wrong doing of politicians.

Sponsored Content

It also found 92 per cent believed their expenses would increase as a result of the legislation.

Tim Friedman (pictured), head of communications at Preqin, said the prohibition of contingency fees was the most contentious aspect of AB-1743, with most respondents saying it was unfair they should work with no incentive.

Other states are also contemplating introducing similar laws, and this study found that 63 per cent of those surveyed would not register in any states if this happened, while 27 per cent would register selectively depending on the opportunities.

In March last year, the CalSTRS’ board supported this bill saying it enhanced transparency, and that it augmented CalSTRS current policy on ethical and fiduciary conduct and was in alignment with CalSTRS corporate governance policy.

However while the Teachers’ Retirement Board supported AB 1743, the board expressed concerns that there may be “unintended consequences to emerging managers and minority-owned firms and their ability to work with large investors like CalSTRS”.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CalPERS examines adopting SDGs

The $357 billion pension plan will examine aligning its portfolio with the UN’s SDGs, which would give the fund’s ESG engagement a more keen focus on social objectives such as ending poverty.

QSuper chair Karl Morris opens up

In this Q&A, the chairman of Queensland’s $72 billion superannuation fund reflects on going public offer, launching an insurance arm, and the much-debated representative trustee board model.

Investors face unprecedented change

AustralianSuper CIO Mark Delaney and CFSGAM’s Mark Lazberger told the CFA Australian Investment Conference that everything from technology to diversity was evolving to reshape the profession.

Most popular stories of 2017

This year, as you might expect, our readers placed six investor profiles among our top 10 most read stories. See what other types of stories topped the list and find out what was No. 1.

Investors launch Climate Action 100+

Hundreds of global investors, including CalPERS and the Swedish buffer funds, have come together to pursue low-carbon goals by working actively with big companies and publicising their progress.

Inside Canada’s exemplary pensions

A report by the World Bank showcases the features of the Canadian model that have made it the poster-child of good pension design.

Previous