PIMCO predicts a “new normal” to reign in investment markets

A “new normal” will reign in investment markets after the shocks of last year, according to PIMCO, with the manager’s secular outlook favouring investment at the front-end of the yield curve as well as income producing instruments. This article looks at the outcomes of its recent secular forum including a call for investment management vehicles to be made more responsive and robust.

PIMCO’s secular forum, attended by investment professionals globally, guides the way it structures portfolios in terms of duration, yield curve position, sector exposure and credit quality. It is the manager’s belief that secular economic, political and social trends exert the most influence on bond markets. After its most recent meeting that outlook will be a journey of stops, starts and volatility.

The forum, attended by global PIMCO staff as well as external participants including former Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan, and Nobel laureate in Economics, Mike Spence, concluded that the next three to five years will be characterised by slow growth in developed economies, with emerging economies to bifurcate, short term deflation and long term inflation, and US dollar risk.

As a result PIMCO, which manages $756 billion in assets, says an environment of low growth and political uncertainty favours high-quality, yield-oriented securities over those offering mainly capital gains.

In addition it says a focus on global securities, over US bonds, will yield benefits, and investors should look to protect themselves against a weaker US dollar.

Sponsored Content

According to CEO and Co-CIO Mohamed El-Elrain, in his summary of the conference posted on the PIMCO website, the world has changed in a manner that is unlikely to be reversed over the next few years.

“Put another way, markets are recovering from a shock that goes way, way beyond a cyclical flesh wound.

“It is not just about the major realignment of the financial system and the extent to which governments have intervened to offset market failures. And it goes beyond the massive increase in government deficits and
government debt in virtually every systemically important country in the world (at a time when few countries can credibly pre-commit to the type of fiscal primary surplus required to subsequently reverse the massive deterioration in the debt dynamics),” he says.

“It’s also about the structural change in how savings are mobilized and allocated, nationally and across borders. It is about the shifting balance between the public and private sectors. And we should not forget the potentially long-lasting consequences of the erosion of trust in such basic parameters of a market system as the sanctity of contracts and
property rights, the rule of law, and the robustness of the capital structure. Such trust can be lost quickly but takes a long time to restore.”

The PIMCO dubbed “new normal” is increasingly resonating in policy circles and among market practitioners, reflecting a growing realisation that some of the changes to markets, households, institutions, and government policies are unlikely to be reversed in the next few years, El-Elrain says.

“Markets will revert to a mean, but it will not look anything like that of recent years. Relative to where it is coming from, the financial system will be de-levered, de-globalised, and re-regulated. Global growth will be lower and unemployment higher, notwithstanding the continued rotation of dynamism away from industrial countries and toward emerging economies. Price formation in many markets will be influenced by the legacy and, in some cases, continuation of direct government involvement. Burden sharing will feature more prominently, being one feature of the heavier hand of government in economic life,” he says.

“For a financial industry known for its famously short memory (and related infrastructures and behaviour), this will feel like a new normal. Adaptations will be needed as the configuration of risks and returns shift, government debt balloons, and capital structures potentially migrate toward a simplified structure consisting just of equity and senior debt instruments. Business models will need to be retooled, and investment management vehicles made more responsive and robust.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous