Pension funds to sustain climate change pressure

Pension funds globally should maintain the pressure on governments to deliver on their promised emission reduction targets, in the wake of a “disappointing” result in Copenhagen, according to the executive director of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, Stephanie Pfeifer.

While the Copenhagen summit produced “good momentum” from countries which hadn’t made commitments before, such as Brazil and China, she said the lack of a legally binding agreement was disappointing.

In the first half of 2010 the IIGCC will focus on policy in order to push for a legally binding treaty before COP in Mexico at the end of the year.

“What we need to do is keep up the pressure and call on these countries to do what they said they would do,” she said.

Pfeifer said one hopeful aspect of the Copenhagen accord was the blank tables at the back of the document allowing each country to fill out their own targets. This needs to be completed before the end of January but it remains to be seen if this will be legally binding.

Sponsored Content

The IIGCC, which is a forum for collaboration on climate change for European investors, collaborated with other regional organisations in September to sign a policy statement calling for a strong and binding international treaty that will reduce pollution and catalyse massive global investments in low-carbon technologies. It was signed by 181 investors with collective assets of $13 trillion.

A recent study commissioned by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change showed the private sector would have to supply close to 90 per cent of the funds needed to meet the climate change challenge.

One of the key objectives of the group is to catalyse greater investment in a low carbon economy by bringing investors together to use their collective influence with companies, policymakers and investors.

It will continue to survey investors on how they incorporate climate change into their long-term investment strategies, and is collaborating with Mercer once again to survey pension funds in January.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous