Passive tilt for Massachusetts state fund

The $42 billion Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management (PRIM) will move half of its developed non-US equity portfolio and 25 per cent of its emerging market equity portfolio into passive strategies and has begun a search for a single manager for each asset class with a commencement date of May.

For the non-US equity portfolio the size of the mandate will be $1.5 billion, while emerging markets will be up to $600 million.

In developed equities the fund currently employs eight investment managers for US and international equities, although State Street Global Advisors is the only passive manager, with mandates in both asset classes.

Its emerging markets allocation is currently entirely actively managed by three managers, Emerging Markets Management, GMO and T Rowe Price.

The fund’s long term target allocation is 49 per cent global equity, 13 per cent core fixed income, 6 per cent value-added fixed income, 10 per cent private equity, 10 per cent real estate, 4 per cent timber/natural resources and 8 per cent hedge funds.

Sponsored Content

The move to passive will bring investment management of its emerging market and developed non-US equities in line with a strategic investment policy

The fund is also looking for a manager for its economically targeted investments program, which was established in 2003, and currently has $270 million invested, with the aim of seeking investments that benefit the “Commonwealth as a whole”.

At the moment it invests in a well-diversified portfolio of fixed income, real estate, and alternative investments. Although in its early stages the program makes claim to have created more than 2,500 jobs and issues more than 1,400 mortgages among low-moderate income home buyers, among other things.

Ennis Knupp is the fund’s advisor.

Asset Owner:Massachusetts PRIM

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous