Overcoming UNPRI implementation hurdles

With some government-committed funding, the Responsible Investment Academy, has the flexibility to achieve its aim of being the first global academic-training centre to teach pension funds and their service providers how to formally incorporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues in their investment assessments. Amanda White spoke to chair of the academy’s advisory council, Steve Gibbs.

About 180 global institutional investors, and more than 300 hundred of their service providers, agree with the United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI) enough to sign up to them. And yet, still most internal fund investment staff and funds management  analysts struggle with how to practically implement these principles into their analysis of investments.

Principles 1 and 4 go some way to instructing how to do this, with guidance such as “ask investment service providers to integrate ESG factors into evolving research and analysis” or “revisit relationships with service providers that fail to meet ESG expectations”.

But this doesn’t give much instruction on how to actually implement ESG considerations into stock picking analysis, quantitative modelling or risk management from an analysts perspective, be they an external provider or internal funds manager.

This is the logic behind the idea by Louise O’Hallaran, executive director of the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA), to set up a Responsible Investment Academy.

Sponsored Content

Using some face-to-face technology, and embracing web technology, the Academy will offer a series of progressive, multi-media training courses, starting with professional development seminars that will be rolled out before the end of this year, spurred by the assistance of the Australian Government’s A$2.5 million ($2 million) financial commitment over three years.

With a global reach, the Academy will be managed by the RIAA and governed by an Australian and international advisory council, chaired by Steve Gibbs, who was also a representative on the UNPRI steering committee and global investor group that set up the principles.

According to Gibbs, while there has been great interest in the principles, there is a significant gap in how to implement them.

The aim is a formal academic-level training program available for investment professionals to develop skills in this area, will help in the implementation and development of the principles.

Indeed the PRI says: “for institutional investors to make these Principles work, they will need to encourage a change in the way that their agents incorporate ESG issues into their processes”.

According to Gibbs the Academy will provide responsible investment research, policy and innovation and in particular provide investment professionals with a structured education and training program on key responsible investment risks, opportunities and concepts.

Funds manager analysts and brokers will be the main focus of the program, but it will extend to business development managers, as well as pension fund staff and trustees.

“I think even if internal fund staff and trustees knew the questions to ask, they wouldn’t know if they were getting the right answer,” Gibbs says.

Since the Australian Government’s commitment to the academy, Gibbs and his advisory council, made up of industry and investor representatives, have been developing the curriculum and deciding on the best delivery mechanisms.

While the academy has decided on an online delivery provider, the decision whether to partner with a tertiary education facility has not yet been made.

“On one hand it would be better not to, as we are looking at developing very practical courses,” he says.

It is expected that professional development seminars will be held before the end of the year, but Gibbs says it is a two-year project to fully develop the course.

Gordon Noble, principal at Responsible Investment Consulting, is the project officer.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous