Opportunities vast in credit, but public markets less risky: Wurts

Investment grade corporate debt, non-agency residential and
commercial mortgages, high yield corporate debt, and private equity distressed
debt all constitute recommended potential mandates in the credit markets,
according to director of research at US-based Wurts and Associates, Eric
Petroff.

While Petroff acknowledged it was an institution
preference as to how much risk to take, he said bank loans/mezzanine debt and
hedge funds were not recommended.

According to Wurts the recent economic and financial market
turmoil has fundamentally altered the landscape of investment opportunities in
credit-based income investments, and the scope and breadth of these
opportunities necessitates a broad examination of the credit universe.

“In our estimation, liquid public market investments appear
to offer a compelling trade off between risk, return, liquidity, ease of
deployment, and other operational issues, with other illiquid opportunities
making sense secondary considerations.

“When we speak of return efficiency, we refer to the
combination of several factors; liquidity, audit considerations, fees, standard
deviation of returns, and total return on investment. We believe public markets
offer the best combination of these factors. Therefore we believe traditional
public market opportunities should be the primary focus for investors, with
secondary consideration being given to private opportunities.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous