…as management costs creep up on OMERS

The $48.4 billion OMERS, which plans to have 90 per cent of assets directly managed by 2012, increased its investment management expenses in 2009 by 8 per cent, a figure it claims is offset by lower investment operating and third-party manager expenses.

Investment management expenses were $246 million in 2009, compared with $227 million in 2008, with the majority of the increase due to salary expenses.

Of the total investment management expenses for the year, $100 million were in salaries, which was significantly more than in 2008 when $76 million was spent on salaries.

Travel and communication was also up, from $7 million to $9 million, and system development and other purchased services increased from $11 million to $14 million in the year.

Investment operating and manager expenses decreased from $114 to $110 million over the year.

Sponsored Content

At the end of 2009 about 80 per cent of assets were managed directly, compared with about 70 per cent at the end of 2008.

The fund is also plans to enhance investment returns and better manage risks by implementing an enterprise-wide “direct drive” active management strategy which will increase the level of direct active management of investments.

According to OMERS’ annual report, the board believes that active asset management produces superior risk-adjusted returns compared with passive investing, and this includes originating investments through proprietary research.

This was seen in a number of ways across the OMERS businesses, including OMERS Capital Markets repatriating more than $2 billion from external managers in 2009, to establish an internally managed global equity portfolio and tactical portfolio to provide asset mix flexibility and substantially increase the debt of its investment research team.

OMERS has a long-term asset allocation weighted 53 per cent to public market investments and 47 per cent to private market investments and, at the end of 2009 private market investments represented about 39.1 per cent, compared with 39.8 per cent in 2008.

At the end of December the fund had 60.9 per cent in public markets, 10.2 per cent in private equity, 15.7 per cent in infrastructure and 13.2 per cent in real estate.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Real estate sustainability

The Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB), which will launch its third annual sustainability survey today, has announced a partnership with the Global Reporting Initiative to enhance sustainability reporting. The survey allows participating fund managers to benchmark their portfolio on environmental and social performance against their peers. The GRESB Foundation is backed by 30 institutional

Top1000funds.com audience using social media for business

Thank you to all our readers who responded to the Top1000funds.com Audience Behaviour Survey. The survey’s overall aim was to allow us to better tailor our portfolio of products and events to you our readers. Some of the interesting findings included that our typical reader is aged between 41 and 50 and earns between $96,000

Global property lures investors

Property investors should look beyond the current languid growth in developed market economies and position their portfolios for a recovery in the world economy in 2013 and 2014, Mark Roberts the global head of RREEF Real Estate says. Roberts, who also chairs the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), points to initial yield

Why Global Investment Matters

The recent rally on global markets does not mean that the risk environment has abated Towers Watson’s global head of investment Carl Hess has warned. Speaking from New York prior to the launch of the consultant’s report Global Investment Matters, Hess says that while the risk of the imminent collapse of financial markets has lessened,

Extracting value from managers

Three funds find effective ways to get better value from staff, co-investment and private markets. The Danish ATP, Australian Sunsuper and the Teachers Retirement System of Texas are among the funds looking at innovative ways to extract value and interact with the managers of their private equity allocations. Institutional investors are increasingly seeking new ways

Limited partners hold fee-bargaining power

In a harsh capital-raising climate, ATP Private Equity Partners and TRS have different startegies on how to drive hard bargains on private equity fees. Institutional investors are gaining concessions on private equity management fees, with a near-record number of funds on the road seeking funds resulting in a shift in bargaining power to limited partners.

Previous