…as management costs creep up on OMERS

The $48.4 billion OMERS, which plans to have 90 per cent of assets directly managed by 2012, increased its investment management expenses in 2009 by 8 per cent, a figure it claims is offset by lower investment operating and third-party manager expenses.

Investment management expenses were $246 million in 2009, compared with $227 million in 2008, with the majority of the increase due to salary expenses.

Of the total investment management expenses for the year, $100 million were in salaries, which was significantly more than in 2008 when $76 million was spent on salaries.

Travel and communication was also up, from $7 million to $9 million, and system development and other purchased services increased from $11 million to $14 million in the year.

Investment operating and manager expenses decreased from $114 to $110 million over the year.

Sponsored Content

At the end of 2009 about 80 per cent of assets were managed directly, compared with about 70 per cent at the end of 2008.

The fund is also plans to enhance investment returns and better manage risks by implementing an enterprise-wide “direct drive” active management strategy which will increase the level of direct active management of investments.

According to OMERS’ annual report, the board believes that active asset management produces superior risk-adjusted returns compared with passive investing, and this includes originating investments through proprietary research.

This was seen in a number of ways across the OMERS businesses, including OMERS Capital Markets repatriating more than $2 billion from external managers in 2009, to establish an internally managed global equity portfolio and tactical portfolio to provide asset mix flexibility and substantially increase the debt of its investment research team.

OMERS has a long-term asset allocation weighted 53 per cent to public market investments and 47 per cent to private market investments and, at the end of 2009 private market investments represented about 39.1 per cent, compared with 39.8 per cent in 2008.

At the end of December the fund had 60.9 per cent in public markets, 10.2 per cent in private equity, 15.7 per cent in infrastructure and 13.2 per cent in real estate.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous