Ohio uncertain on alternatives consultant

The $72 billion Ohio Public Employees Retirement System is looking for an investment consultant to advise on its $10 billion alternatives program, and is considering whether to hire separate consultants for each asset class or one consultant to advise on the entire program.

The fund, which has $60 billion in the defined benefit fund and the remainder in health care, has about $3 billion in private equity, $5 billion in real estate, $665 million in hedge funds, $800 million in REITs, and $98 million in commodities.

The RFP document outlines that the OPERS board wants to consider whether to consolidate all strategic alternatives investment consultant relations with one firm or to retain its existing arrangement of separate mandates – for private equity, real estate, and for the first time, hedge funds.

“OPERS understands that consolidating services with fewer providers usually provides cost savings. Nonetheless, OPERS also understands that many plans retain specialist expertise through separate consultant mandates, as OPERS is currently structured. Consulting firms have developed different business models. In some cases, those models are in transition,” the document says.

With this in mind, and in particular the consideration of the value proposition of using separate services for alternatives asset classes, the fund is asking for proposal on two distinct levels: either for individual asset classes; or as strategic alternatives consultant, combining all three.

Services for alternatives would include market overview and strategy for each asset type as well as policy advice, program guidelines, sector allocations, and investment pacing models but would not include manager-level selection or advice.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous