Norwegian SWF pushes equity exposure beyond 50pc amid Q1 losses

The $US 324 billion Government Pension Fund – Global (NBIM) of Norway pushed its allocation to equities beyond 50 per cent in the course of Q1 2009 at the expense of its fixed income portfolio, maintaining a strategic bent towards a higher exposure to growth assets.

In the northern summer of 2007, the fund decided to steadily build up its equity exposure from 40 to 60 per cent. At the end of Q1 2009, its allocation to equities stood at 52.6 per cent, which included an average holding of 0.86 per cent across global markets, and 1.58 per cent in European markets, according to the latest NBIM Quarterly report.

The fund returned minus 4.81 per cent for the first quarter of 2009. Relative to its benchmark portfolio, which is defined by the Norway’s Ministry of Finance, it produced an excess return of minus 0.35 per cent.

It attributed the weak results to its fixed income portfolio, which held bonds in the core and supplementary capital of financial institutions that were bought before the financial crisis broke out and became illiquid as it intensified. The portfolio produced a negative excess return of 0.92 per cent, while its equities book returned 0.30 per cent.

A stronger Norwegian krone also led to a loss of $US 27 billion during the quarter.

Sponsored Content

Portions of the NBIM’s equity and fixed income portfolios are outsourced to external managers. The proportion of externally-managed assets rose by $US 6.7 billion to $US 54.8 billion during the quarter.

One result of parcelling out this capital as mandates was a large increase in the cumulative fees paid to external managers, up from $US 11.7 million early last year to $US 65.1 million at the end of Q1 2009, including an increase in performance fees of $US 43.1 million.

The fund stated these fee payments reflected the accrual of costs only, and not the size of the fees paid. Meantime, many new mandates were awarded in 2008, and a number of its equity managers notched good numbers in Q1.

During this period, the volume of inflows into the fund was the lowest since 2004, at $US 6.9 billion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous