Norwegian SWF pushes equity exposure beyond 50pc amid Q1 losses

The $US 324 billion Government Pension Fund – Global (NBIM) of Norway pushed its allocation to equities beyond 50 per cent in the course of Q1 2009 at the expense of its fixed income portfolio, maintaining a strategic bent towards a higher exposure to growth assets.

In the northern summer of 2007, the fund decided to steadily build up its equity exposure from 40 to 60 per cent. At the end of Q1 2009, its allocation to equities stood at 52.6 per cent, which included an average holding of 0.86 per cent across global markets, and 1.58 per cent in European markets, according to the latest NBIM Quarterly report.

The fund returned minus 4.81 per cent for the first quarter of 2009. Relative to its benchmark portfolio, which is defined by the Norway’s Ministry of Finance, it produced an excess return of minus 0.35 per cent.

It attributed the weak results to its fixed income portfolio, which held bonds in the core and supplementary capital of financial institutions that were bought before the financial crisis broke out and became illiquid as it intensified. The portfolio produced a negative excess return of 0.92 per cent, while its equities book returned 0.30 per cent.

A stronger Norwegian krone also led to a loss of $US 27 billion during the quarter.

Sponsored Content

Portions of the NBIM’s equity and fixed income portfolios are outsourced to external managers. The proportion of externally-managed assets rose by $US 6.7 billion to $US 54.8 billion during the quarter.

One result of parcelling out this capital as mandates was a large increase in the cumulative fees paid to external managers, up from $US 11.7 million early last year to $US 65.1 million at the end of Q1 2009, including an increase in performance fees of $US 43.1 million.

The fund stated these fee payments reflected the accrual of costs only, and not the size of the fees paid. Meantime, many new mandates were awarded in 2008, and a number of its equity managers notched good numbers in Q1.

During this period, the volume of inflows into the fund was the lowest since 2004, at $US 6.9 billion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous