Giant Norwegian SWF sizes up active management

An external review is being carried out on behalf of one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, the NOK2.47 trillion ($405 billion) Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global, to determine whether active management should continue, with opinions sought from international experts in the UK and US.

Norway’s Ministry of Finance has appointed an international group of specialists to evaluate the experience of the SWF’s fund manager, Norges Bank, in active management, and has also asked the bank to prepare a more detailed plan for active management with descriptions of the main strategies for achieving excess returns.

The international group consists of Professors Andrew Ang from Columbia Business School, Stephen Schaefer from London Business School and William N. Goetzmann from the Yale School of Management.

In addition, international consultant Mercer has been commissioned to write a report on the use of active management and active ownership efforts in other large funds internationally.

In its report to Storting, or Parliament, on the management of Global, the Ministry announced that the evolution of the
scheme’s investment strategy would include an external review of the future of active management.

Sponsored Content

“The Ministry will in spring 2010 present the Storting with more information and an assessment of whether or to what extent active management of the Government Pension Fund – Global ought to be continued,” the report said.

The Report No.20 to the Storting notes that the Ministry assumes that financial markets are largely “efficient”, both at any given point in time and over time.

“With financial markets that are generally efficient, it is difficult for active managers to achieve a return in excess of the market return,” the Ministry wrote.

The fund achieved its biggest ever single quarter return of 12.7 per cent, 2.1 per cent above the benchmark, in the second quarter.

In a letter from Norges Bank to the Ministry in March the bank said that now that the fund’s investment universe and benchmark portfolio were gradually being expanded, “there is growing exposure to markets where there is little reason to expect the efficient markets hypothesis to hold. This increases the potential to add value through active management”.

The Ministry said the evolution of Global’s investment strategy ‘may result in asset allocation that is more similar to the composition of other international funds’.

At the moment the Government Pension Fund has an asset allocation split approximately 60 per cent equities and 40 per cent bonds.

“A basic premise in the work to evolve the strategy is the need for adequate limits on other types of risk than market
risk as well, such as operational risk,” the report noted.

“Another requirement will be the need for follow-up of the operational management that helps ensure that the interests of the managers are aligned with the objective of the general investment strategy
for the fund.”

Meanwhile, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) has formed a new executive team as part of the final phase of
an organisational overhaul that started with the appointment of Yngve Slyngstad as chief executive officer in January 2008.

Extensive changes were made in 2008, with the integration of a number of functions which were previously separated
between equity and fixed income management. In addition, risk management was strengthened and fixed income management was restructured.

The new management team of nine includes Slyngstad, Stephen A. Hirsch as deputy chief executive officer, Bengt O. Enge and as chief investment officer.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous