Giant Norwegian SWF sizes up active management

An external review is being carried out on behalf of one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, the NOK2.47 trillion ($405 billion) Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global, to determine whether active management should continue, with opinions sought from international experts in the UK and US.

Norway’s Ministry of Finance has appointed an international group of specialists to evaluate the experience of the SWF’s fund manager, Norges Bank, in active management, and has also asked the bank to prepare a more detailed plan for active management with descriptions of the main strategies for achieving excess returns.

The international group consists of Professors Andrew Ang from Columbia Business School, Stephen Schaefer from London Business School and William N. Goetzmann from the Yale School of Management.

In addition, international consultant Mercer has been commissioned to write a report on the use of active management and active ownership efforts in other large funds internationally.

In its report to Storting, or Parliament, on the management of Global, the Ministry announced that the evolution of the
scheme’s investment strategy would include an external review of the future of active management.

Sponsored Content

“The Ministry will in spring 2010 present the Storting with more information and an assessment of whether or to what extent active management of the Government Pension Fund – Global ought to be continued,” the report said.

The Report No.20 to the Storting notes that the Ministry assumes that financial markets are largely “efficient”, both at any given point in time and over time.

“With financial markets that are generally efficient, it is difficult for active managers to achieve a return in excess of the market return,” the Ministry wrote.

The fund achieved its biggest ever single quarter return of 12.7 per cent, 2.1 per cent above the benchmark, in the second quarter.

In a letter from Norges Bank to the Ministry in March the bank said that now that the fund’s investment universe and benchmark portfolio were gradually being expanded, “there is growing exposure to markets where there is little reason to expect the efficient markets hypothesis to hold. This increases the potential to add value through active management”.

The Ministry said the evolution of Global’s investment strategy ‘may result in asset allocation that is more similar to the composition of other international funds’.

At the moment the Government Pension Fund has an asset allocation split approximately 60 per cent equities and 40 per cent bonds.

“A basic premise in the work to evolve the strategy is the need for adequate limits on other types of risk than market
risk as well, such as operational risk,” the report noted.

“Another requirement will be the need for follow-up of the operational management that helps ensure that the interests of the managers are aligned with the objective of the general investment strategy
for the fund.”

Meanwhile, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) has formed a new executive team as part of the final phase of
an organisational overhaul that started with the appointment of Yngve Slyngstad as chief executive officer in January 2008.

Extensive changes were made in 2008, with the integration of a number of functions which were previously separated
between equity and fixed income management. In addition, risk management was strengthened and fixed income management was restructured.

The new management team of nine includes Slyngstad, Stephen A. Hirsch as deputy chief executive officer, Bengt O. Enge and as chief investment officer.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous