New governance guidelines for fiduciary investors

The International Corporate Governance Network has published an updated set of guidelines for fiduciary investors to help assess and control corporate risk in their portfolios.

The guidelines, launched at last week’s ICGN mid-year conference in San Francisco, provide more detail in the recommendations for funds in their assessment of companies in which they invest and ways to improve the governance of those companies.

The mid-year conference was hosted by the two big Californian public sector funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, and featured a discussion between Philip Angelides, the chair of the US Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission looking into causes of the global financial crisis, and Lord John McFall, former chairman of the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee and member of the Future of Banking Commission in the UK. There were 25 speakers at the one-day event, on October 7, which was preceded by a member dinner. Investors in the room were said to represent almost $10 trillion in assets.

Anne Stausboll, chief executive of CalPERS, said the ICGN had made great strides in advancing the goals of the conference, which were to bolster financial sustainability and restore market stability, corporate value and public trust.

Jack Ehnes, chief executive of CalSTRS, said governance and sustainability were significant risk factors facing investors, comprehensively addressed by the conference and the launch of the new corporate risk oversight principles.

Integration of ESG and sustainability related issues into a pension fund’s investment process was a recurrent theme in the various conference sessions.

Sponsored Content

The new principles are designed to be observed, voluntarily, alongside previous principles, primarily from the 2009 Global Corporate Governance Principles publication which included advice on risk management, effective company board behaviour, responsibilities of boards and also how they should handle whistle-blowing behaviour.

There are about 500 members of ICGN – mainly big pension and other funds – in 50 countries.

The latest publication provides further detail on: guidance for the internal board and company process on corporate risk oversight; guidance on investor responsibility in the context of corporate risk oversight; and, guidelines on board and company disclosure of the risk oversight process.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous