MSCI invites comment on SRI indexes

MSCI’s proposed global socially responsible indexes are being critiqued by not only MSCI clients but by the wider community as MSCI widens its consultation process for the proposal.

MSCI’s executive director, Michael Anderson (pictured), said the global index provider is consulting with different market participants (clients and non-clients) such as passive and active managers, asset owners and brokers.

“So far MSCI had consultation discussions with all these types of market participants,” he said. “MSCI is happy to speak with any market participant interested in sharing his feedback.”

MSCI is also actively soliciting feedback from its major clients.

The SRI index is part of a bigger proposal to create an “extensive lineup” of indexes that will incorporate ESG for the first time, including country and industry indexes and all will adopt the best-in-class methodology.

Sponsored Content

The global social responsible index aims to support the benchmarking and other index-related needs of investors who seek to invest in accordance with their values, such as religious beliefs, moral standards or ethical views.

Companies that are inconsistent with a specific values-based criteria will be excluded from the proposed index, instead it will specifically target companies with high ESG ratings relative to their sector peers.

“In the current methodology proposal, MSCI would apply a screening based on the company’s individual ESG rating in order to ensure high ESG quality as well as based on a ‘standard’ set of values-based criteria: alcohol, civilian firearms, gambling, military weapons, nuclear power, tobacco, adult entertainment and GMO,” said Anderson. “All the research information (ratings and values-based screens) used in the construction of the MSCI ESG Indices are developed and maintained in house my MSCI ESG Research.”

Anderson said the current proposed MSCI Global Socially Responsible Index would include 422 constituents, based on December 1, 2010, data.

MSCI launched the proposal, which propelled ESG factors into the mainstream, following its merger with RiskMetrics in June last year.

“The consultation was launched based on preliminary client interest in such an index,” said Anderson.

It is not definite at this stage if the consultation will lead to the creation of the MSCI globally socially responsible indices; a final decision will be announced March 4.

One response to “MSCI invites comment on SRI indexes”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous