Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors.

Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer, said the landscape for risk includes factors such as resource scarcity, climate risk, an ageing population and a growing population, and so reliance on past performance in risk assessment is no longer adequate.

Mercer looks at the importance of complexity economics and how risk reporting is being influenced by the changing nature of risks, and the interconnectedness of risk.

In the World Economic Forum’s 2015 Global Risks report, which highlights the most significant long-term risks by drawing on the perspectives of experts and global decisionmakers, water crises were the greatest risk facing the world.

Other top risks alongside that and interstate conflict in terms of impact are: rapid and massive spread of infectious diseases, weapons of mass destruction and failure of climate change adaptation.

Given this perspective, Mercer is now talking to clients about looking at risk management using seven different risk management tools to measure, manage and report on risk. Many of these focus on climate risk, stewardship and long-term investing to assess and manage total portfolio risk.

Sponsored Content
  1. ESG ratings. Mercer now has more than 6000 ratings at the strategy level across all products and asset classes.

An example of how this is being used is that Bloomberg, as a plan sponsor, in its defined contribution plan is white-labelling the ESG ratings and providing this information to employees for selecting funds.

  1. Mercer is increasingly looking at the security-level information for its ESG analysis. It will be announcing a security-level partnership soon.
  2. Mercer now assigns ESG passive ratings and believes there is not enough focus on the assets that are managed passively. It is focusing on asset owners challenging passive managers.
  3. In the UK and other countries where there is a stewardship code, Mercer is advising on and helping with assessing whether managers are compliant; it has a ratings system of green, amber and red on the code principles and stewardship overall.
  4. Mercer’s new study, Investing in a time of climate change looks at climate risk in terms of technology, resource availability, impact and policy (TRIP) and provides a quantitative measure for investors’ climate risk in their portfolios. Ultimately the assessment can calculate the basis point impact of climate change on the portfolio.

“Fiduciaries need to be aware of climate risk and where their exposure is, they can then tilt towards those things that do better,” Ambachtsheer says.

  1. Carbon footprinting. This is a risk tool to capture policy risk.
  2. Insurance tool to assess total portfolio risk of real asset climate risks.

“No investor I have come across has a map of the world with all their physical assets on it. The concentrations of risk are ignored,” Ambachtsheer says.

Mercer is collaborating internally with Marsh and Guy Carpenter to do a real assets environmental risk assessment using insurance tools.

“We will be using insurance tools to run risk analysis at the total portfolio level and property, infrastructure, timber and agriculture,” Ambachtsheer says.

Mercer is also doing a lot of work on long-term investing, and asking such questions as whether investors should be giving managers targets beyond relative benchmark performance.

“How do you behave like a long-term investor should be a standing item on the investment committee meeting [agenda],” Ambachtsheer says. “We aim to embed long-term thinking.”

 

 

World Economic Forum 2015 Global Risks report

Top 5 global risks in terms of impact

  1. Water crises
  2. Rapid and massive spread of infectious diseases
  3. Weapons of mass destruction
  4. Interstate conflict with regional consequences
  5. Failure of climate change adaptation

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

Previous