Mercer, Callan courtship augurs more engagements

The recent alliance between Mercer Investment Consulting and Callan Associates to acquire the bulk of Evaluation Associates – the investment consulting arm of Milliman Inc – could be the start of a cooperation that targets other potentially attractive acquisitions in the US industry.

The US consulting industry has seen several high-profile mergers in recent years and a wave of further industry consolidation is expected.

This latest deal continues the close relationship between Mercer and Callan in the wake of their failed merger deal in early 2009.

As part of the deal, Callan Associates would acquire 10 public defined-benefit clients from Evaluation Associates.

The total value of the assets under management from these public sector clients was not disclosed, but Evaluation Associates has $200 billion of assets under advisement.

This is the biggest co-operation between the Mercer and Callan since their failed 2009 courtship.

Sponsored Content

There has been speculation this could be a taste of things to come, with the two consulting giants potentially co-operating to target further attractive acquisitions in the US consultation market.

Mercer announced in October last year it would quit the US public fund arena, and this could allow both Mercer and Callan to each carve out distinct areas of any potential acquisition’s client base.

“By co-operating on this transaction, Mercer and Callan are able to pursue their separate, strategic goals in the investment consulting market,” a Mercer spokesperson said.

The consolidation in the US industry has been driven not only by the usual merger and acquisition considerations but also by the changing nature of investment consultancy.

Investors are increasingly demanding a better alignment between liabilities and asset management and more skills in alternative investments – something many boutique firms may struggle to provide.

A watershed in this change came last year when Hewitt Associates snapped up Chicago-based Ennis Knupp in a deal that made them one of the biggest investment consultancies in the world.

The deal combined Hewitt’s actuarial business and extensive skills managing pension risk with the investment management talents at Ennis Knupp, allowing it to provide advice that could provide expertise on both sides of a fund’s balance sheet.

Mercer also moved to take advantage of this investor demand for deeper resources and knowledge when it bought St Louis-based Hammond Associates in January.

Not only did it give Mercer a foothold in the endowment, foundation and wealth management segments of the US market, but it also provided another attractive area of specialisation to potential clients.

This latest deal further bolsters some of the benefits of the Hammond acquisition.

Evaluation Associates said that half of its 155 clients consisted of a variety of non-profits, including education endowments, private foundations and religious organisations. Ten of its clients are from the public sector.

Evaluation Associates also has 50 defined-benefit plans under advisement and 457 of the defined-contribution plans it managed were with government entities.

Mercer’s US investment consulting leader, Jeff Schutes (pictured), has hinted at further acquisition targets in interviews following the announcement of this latest deal.

“This acquisition, along with our acquisition of Hammond Associates earlier this year, underscores Mercer’s commitment to our investment business and our determination to increase our US market share,” Schutes said.

In subsequent interviews he has flagged a 20 to 25 per cent US market share as an aim and has said Mercer plans to put “space between us and the second (biggest) player”.

Neither Mercer nor Callan would detail how much of the Evaluation Associates assets under management they would be respectively taking over.

Mercer said it has more than $3.7 trillion under management, putting in the top tier of investment consultants.

The various strands of the Evaluation Associates deal are expected to be closed by June 30.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous