Funds must rethink global equities, says consultant

Mercer Investment Consulting has undertaken a review of global equities and is about to roll out to clients a paper which questions traditional cap-weighted benchmarks.


Andrew Kirton, global head of investment consulting for Mercer in London, said the work would be presented to clients within the next few weeks. He was speaking during the three-city Mercer Asia Pacific Investment Forum – in Sydney, Beijing and Hong Kong between April 20-26 – although he was unable to attend the Sydney event because of the airline delays.

“We have questioned all the assumptions in our clients’ global equity portfolios,” Kirton said. “They are mostly invested in developed markets with a home-country bias and big US component ” But the emerging markets are under-represented and arguably have better prospects than the West. Funds may be limiting themselves.”

The problem for investors in the West, however, is that the big emerging markets such as China and India still have very volatile listed markets where access is not as easy as in the developed markets. There are also different risks associated with some emerging markets, including political risks.

Kirton said that Mercer was looking to provide some more “frontier thinking” about global portfolios, not just in allocations between developed and developing markets.

He said, for instance, there was now a fair body of evidence to suggest that low-volatility stocks tended to provide a better risk/return profile over time than high-volatility stocks.

Sponsored Content

Mercer revamped its investment consulting research last year with the addition of several “boutiques” within the firm, which also resulted in increased research resources for alternative asset classes.

The move was in response to the growth of specialist asset consulting firms as well as the changing relationship between consultants and funds, whereby many funds are increasing their in-house investment teams.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous