McKinsey’s tips on sustainability integration

More companies are recognising sustainability as a core business issue, but according to McKinsey and Company they are still failing to capture its full value, in particular struggling with incorporating it into organisational processes such as performance management.

A McKinsey global survey, garnering responses from 3,344 executives from the full range of regions, company size and industries, found that the leaders in sustainability have in place the key components of performance measurement.

In this year’s survey respondents were better at fostering an organisational culture around sustainability but struggle with execution including employee motivation and capability building.

Of the responses 58 per cent of executives say sustainability is fully or mostly integrated into their companies’ culture, but 38 per cent say that is true for performance measurement.

The good news is that this year McKinsey found that 43 per cent of executives say their companies seek to align sustainability with their overall business goals, missions or values, up from 30 per cent in 2012.

One of the reasons for the shift, according to McKinsey, is more involvement from leaders in the business with chief executives now twice as likely to say sustainability is their top priority.

Sponsored Content

But while sustainability is rising in significance there is still some way to integrate it into the core business, with challenges in execution including the absence of performance incentives and the presence of short-term earnings pressure that’s at odds with the long-term nature of the issues, as well as accountability.

According to McKinsey there are common organisational traits among those that stand out as leaders.

These are: setting aggressive external targets or goals for sustainability initiatives; a unified sustainability strategy with clearly articulated strategic priorities, aggressive internal targets or goals for sustainability initiatives, broad leadership coalition in shaping or co-creating the sustainability strategy, goals and milestones, the financial benefits of sustainability are clearly understood across the organisation.

McKinsey founds that the companies with a unified strategy and no more than five strategic priorities were almost three times as likely to be among the strongest performers, both financially and on measures of sustainability.

Lack of goals is a “sustainability killer”, the report said, and yet McKinsey’s analysis of S&P500 companies suggests that only one in five companies sets quantified, long-term sustainability goals, and half did not have any.

In order to shift McKinsey calls for companies to create accountability around sustainability including incentives, according to the United Nations Global Compact only one in 12 companies link executive remuneration to sustainability performance.

It also calls for companies to make a case that sustainability can pay for itself, and that this has to be done clearly with fully costed financial data and delivered in the language of business.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

How to estimate the equity risk premium

Given the importance of equity risk premium, it is surprising how haphazard the estimation of equity risk premiums remains in practice. This paper by Aswath Damodaran at the New York University Stern School of Business examines a number of different approaches to determining the equity risk premium and why different approaches yield different values. It

Previous