Malaysian investments favour domestic, cross-border strategies

To combat
the financial crisis, Khazanah Nasional Berhard, the US$25.7 billion
investment arm of the Malaysian government, will focus on catalysing domestic
economic growth and continuing its program of strategic cross-border
investments.

Khazanah,
which is entrusted with managing the Malaysian government’s commercial assets
and undertaking strategic domestic and global investments, aims to stimulate
the Malaysian economy by focusing on domestic investments with “high economic
and job creation multipliers,” the public company said in a statement.

The
manager has stakes in more than 50 companies, including an array of ‘government-linked
companies’, which are involved in industries ranging from banking, power,
telecommunications, infrastructure, transport and venture capital.

In the
four years to 2008, Khazanah and its underlying companies injected
approximately RM36 billion (US$9.89 billion) into the Malaysian economy. For
the three years to 2011, it has allocated $15.94 billion to be invested domestically
in industries including telecommunications, infrastructure, health care and
tourism. It will also target sectors that it regards as “new engines of
growth”.

But this
domestic focus will not stall its cross-border investment activities and
ambitions to attract foreign direct investment into

Sponsored Content

Malaysia.

“Khazanah
will continue to strengthen regional investment linkages and selectively look
for two-way investment opportunities to bring in more foreign direct investment
as well as continuing to selectively regionalise,” the company said.

In the
course of 2008, the financial crisis diminished the returns from Khazanah’s
listed investments portfolio, resulting in a decline of 35.7 per cent for the
year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous